Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Salala Attack Revisited: By Sajjad Shaukat (JR84SS3)













Salala Attack Revisited: By Sajjad Shaukat (JR84SS3)
On 26th of November 2011, the US-led NATO forces attacked two Pakistani check-posts on Pak-Afghan border and martyred 24 Pakistani military personnel indiscriminately.
In this regard, two American Apache helicopters and two F-15 Eagle fighter jets targeted the two Pakistani posts, Boulder and Volcano, situated at Salala in the Baizai tehsil of Mohmand Agency. The airstrike was carried out in two phases.
Notably, the aerial attack was coordinated and deliberate, its second phase carried out by American forces after the Pakistan Army informed the ISAF command that their forces were attacking Pakistani troops–and despite this information, it continued.
In this context, a NATO inquiry said that both sides had made mistakes. Pakistan categorically rejected the inquiry report. It had earlier refused to be part of a joint inquiry. Top Pakistan Army officials denied the attack was unintentional.
Reacting to the Salala attack, Pakistan blocked the NATO ground lines of communication to Afghanistan and demanded an apology before the supply line would be unblocked.
Pakistan’s parliament unanimously approved recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) in connection with the re-engagement with the United States. Besides other matters, the recommendations included an immediate cessation of drone attacks and infiltration into Pakistani territory, entailing some conditions regarding supply to NATO forces in Afghanistan across the country. Besides, Pakistan should seek an unconditional apology from the US for November 26, 2011 unprovoked Salala check-posts assault.
Meanwhile, a number of American diplomats including NATO chief had visited Islamabad and met the then Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani and Chief of Army Staff Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani, asking them for re-opening the NATO routes. Setting aside the American pressure, they reiterated that parliament in light of the PCNS recommendations and the Defence Committee of Cabinet would decide on the issue of NATO supply, after negotiating new relationship with the US, based upon equality and non-violation of Pakistani territory.
When Pakistan government remained stern on its stand by keeping the NATO supply lines suspended for the six months in wake of US pressure tactics, on May 10, 2012, the United States House Armed Services Committee approved a bill that would prohibit the preferential procurement of goods or services from Pakistan until the “NATO supply lines are reopened.”
Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen suggested on May 11, 2012 that Pakistan could miss out on important talks on the future of Afghanistan, if it failed to reopen supply routes in time to secure a place at a NATO summit in Chicago on May 20-21, 2012. Indirectly, he disclosed that Pakistan would not be invited to participate in the summit.
On the other side, Prime Minister Gilani confirmed that the Defence Committee of the Cabinet, would debate as to how to repair relations with America in time to attend the NATO summit in Chicago or to boycott it. While, the British Defence Minister Phillip Hamond stated that negotiations on restoration of the NATO supply is progressing in the right direction, but Pakistan would not accept any pre-condition.
In these terms, Pak-US war of nerves accelerated due to American coercive diplomacy towards Islamabad coupled with its double game. In this regard, after the 9/11 tragedy, Pakistan joined the US war against terrorism as frontline state and Islamabad was granted the status of non-NATO ally by Washington because of its earlier successes achieved by Pakistan’s Army and country’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) against the Al-Qaeda militants.
Within a few years, when the US-led NATO forces felt that they were failing in coping with the stiff resistance of the Taliban in Afghanistan, they started false allegations against Pak Army and ISI of supporting the Afghan Taliban. US high officials and their media not only blamed Pakistan for cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan, but also continuously emphasized to ‘do more’ against the insurgents in tribal areas by ignoring the internal backlash in the country such as bomb blasts and suicide attacks which killed thousands of innocent people and personnel of the security.
Cold war had already started between Pakistan and the United States when hundreds of CIA agents entered Pakistan under the guise of diplomats to destabilize the country. On January 11, 2011, Raymond Davis who was CIA agent killed two Pakistanis in Lahore.
Since May 2, 2011, Pak-US relations further deteriorated when without informing Islamabad, US commandos killed Osama Bin Laden in a covert military operation. Afterwards, tension intensified, as America continued its duress on Pakistan in wake of drone attacks on FATA, while brushing aside parliament’s resolution in this respect.
Differences also increased between Islamabad and Washington, because Pakistan’s superior agency, ISI interrupted covert activities of the American so-called diplomats. Notably, ISI thwarted the anti-Pakistan activities of the agents of Blackwater and CIA which had started recruiting Pakistani nationals who were vulnerable. In this connection, with the pre-information of ISI, Pakistan’s police and other security agencies arrested a number of secret agents. On many occasions, ISI helped in stopping the clandestine activities of the CIA spies who were displaying themselves as diplomats. On the information of this top spy agency, Pakistan’s establishment expelled several American spies operating in the country. On the other side, US withheld $800 million in military aid to punish its army and ISI.
It was due to the professional competence of ISI in foiling the anti-Pakistan plot that US and India including their media accelerated deliberate propaganda against ISI.
Nevertheless, in the aftermath of the November 26 incident in Mohmand Agency, Pakistan’s bold steps such as vacation of the Shamsi Airbase, boycott the second Bonn Conference and rejection of the US investigation report regarding the deliberate attack on Salala Army check-posts accelerated tension between Islamabad and Washington.
Some American top officials accused Pakistan-based Haqqani militants behind the well-coordinated attacks in Afghanistan, which occurred on April 15, 2012. US aim was to pressurize Islamabad for restoration of the NATO transit routes.

It is  that confused in their goals, sometimes US high officials praised Pak sacrifices regarding war on terror, sometimes, admitted that stability cannot be achieved in Afghanistan without the help of Pakistan after the withdrawal of foreign troops, sometimes, threatened Islamabad to abandon the Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline project and sometimes, realized that US wants to improve its relationship with Pakistan, but at the same time, they blame Islamabad for safe-havens of militants in the country. While in connivance with India and Israel, America has been continuing its anti-Pakistan activities by supporting militancy in Pakistan and separatism in Balochistan.
Nonetheless, after the Salala incident, Pak-US war of nerves continued, it took the relationship of both the countries to the point of no return. On July 3, 2012, Defence Committee of the Cabinet permitted NATO supplies across the country to Afghanistan after the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apologized the killing of 24 Pakistani soldiers in November 2011 by American air strike on Slalala check posts by saying “sorry”.
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations
Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

Monday, November 26, 2018

Refocus on Mumbai Attacks (JR84SS2) By Sajjad Shaukat










                                                
Refocus on Mumbai Attacks (JR84SS2) By Sajjad Shaukat

On November 26, 2008, several persons were killed in the simultaneous terror attacks in Mumbai. Without any investigation, Indian high officials and media had started blaming Pakistan.
Mumbai attack was just another false flag operation of Indian establishment to gain sympathies of world community and defame Pakistan in the comity of nations. The whole drama was staged to put blame Pakistan and its intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).
It is notable that renowned thinkers, Hobbes, Machiavelli and Morgenthau opine that sometimes, rulers act upon immoral activities like deceit, fraud and falsehood to fulfil their countries’ selfish aims. But such a sinister politics was replaced by new trends such as fair-dealings, reconciliation and economic development. Regrettably, India is still following past politics in modern era.
Under the cover of the Mumbai catastrophe, India began a deliberate propaganda campaign against Pakistan and tried to isolate the latter in the comity of nations by showing that Islamabad was sponsoring terrorism in India. In this regard, Indian former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and its other high officials, while repeating old rhetoric of baseless allegations, stated that Pakistan has “epicentre of terrorism” and Islamabad should “end infrastructure of terrorism.” L.K. Advani, leader of the BJP, while accusing Pakistan as the hotbed of terror in the region, said that Pakistan’s secret agency ISI should be declared a terror outfit.
In this respect, Indian top officials and TV channels had remarked that Indian Mujahideen and the banned Lashkar-e-Tayba (LeT) based in Pakistan and ISI were behind the Mumbai terror attacks. With the assistance of Indian secret agency RAW, Indian investigators fabricated a false story that 10 terrorists who executed Mumbai carnage came in a boat from Karachi and were in contact with the members of the banned Lashker-e-Taiba through phone calls. But a number of questions arise in relation to the so-called links, deliberately entangling Pakistan. First, how it is possible that the militants phoned 100 times inside Pakistan, but they did not call their families? Second, the lonely gunman Ajmal Kasab who was arrested, knew his address and why he did not indicate the names and home addresses of other 9 fugitives with whom he lived for a long time? Third, after the hard journey of more than 50 hours, travelling on the slow moving water, evading 20 coastal guards of Indian Navy, how they reached Mumbai? Fourth, where did they change their muddy shoes and wet dresses? Fifth, how it became possible that they immediately hired a taxi and reached their targets, without taking some rest? Sixth, why the terrorists killed only four people at the Nariman house, sparing the other six guys present there?
Availing the pretext of the Mumbai catastrophe, New Delhi had suspended the process of ‘composite dialogue’ in wake of its highly provocative actions like mobilisation of troops. Islamabad had also taken defensive steps to meet any Indian prospective aggression or surgical strikes. But, India failed in implementing its aggressive plans, because Pakistan also possesses atomic weapons.

However, in the post-Mumbai terror attacks, Indian rulers had started blackmailing Islamabad that they would not resume the talks unless Islamabad takes actions against the culprits of Mumbai mayhem. New Delhi urged Islamabad to arrest the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks. Rejecting Pakistan’s stand that its government or any official agency was not involved in the Mumbai attacks, New Delhi wanted to make Islamabad accept all other Indian demands since our rulers admitted that Ajmal Kasab was Pakistani national. In fact, Islamabad’s admission which had emboldened New Delhi was forced by the US. And, Ajmal Kasab was tortured by the Indian intelligence agencies so as to endorse Indian false story against Islamabad, while giving statement in an Indian court. Suppose, even if he was Pakistani, it did not matter because he was a non-state actor, as non-state actors like smugglers and the militants are found in many countries.
It is of particular attention that on July 19, 2013, the Indian former home ministry and ex-investigating officer Satish Verma disclosed that terror attacks in Mumbai in November 26, 2008 and assault on Indian Parliament in January 12, 2001 were carried out by the Indian government to strengthen anti-terrorism laws.
It has clearly proved that Indian secret agencies; particularly RAW arranged coordinated terror attacks in Mumbai and orchestrated that drama only to defame Pakistan in the world, but also to fulfil a number of other sinister aims.
As a matter of fact, a lack of seriousness on India’s part to settle all disputes, especially Kashmir issue has compelled New Delhi to follow a self-contradictory and confused strategy towards Islamabad.

Hence, New Delhi earnestly found various pretexts to cancel peace talks, while shifting the blame to Islamabad. For example, besides Mumbai attacks, in 2002, under the pretension of terrorist attack on the Indian parliament, India postponed the dialogue process.
In this connection, on July 27, 2015, three gunmen dressed in army uniforms killed at least seven people, including three civilians and four policemen in the Indian district of Gurdaspur, Punjab.
Without any investigation, Indian high officials and media started accusing Pakistan, its banned militant outfits and intelligence agencies for the Gurdaspur incident. Indian Police remarked that the attackers are from Indian-held Kashmir, and some said that they were Sikh separatists, while Indian Punjab police chief claimed that the three gunmen were Muslim, but as yet unidentified. Contradicting speculations, India’s Home Minister Rajnath Singh told parliament that the gunmen came from Pakistan.
Khalistan Movement Chief Manmohan Singh stated that the Gurdaspur incident is “a conspiracy of Indian secret agency RAW to defame Pakistan.”
Besides, prior to the US President Obama’s second visit to New Delhi, Indian intelligence agencies orchestrated a boat drama to defame Pakistan, allegedly reporting that a Pakistani fishing boat as a Pakistan-based outfit group Lashkar-e-Taiba was intercepted by Indian Coast Guards, off the coast of Porebandar, Gujarat. And Indian Coast Guard crew set the boat on fire and it exploded. But, its reality exposed Indian terrorism, because, some Indian high officials admitted that there was no such boat which came from Pakistan.
Similarly, India orchestrated the drama of militants’ attack at Indian Air Force Base in Pathankot on January 2, 2016. Indian media and top civil and military officials started claiming that the attackers had arrived from Pakistani Punjab’s Bahawalpur district, and had links with Jaish-e-Mohammad and ISI. But, despite Islamabad’s cooperation with New Delhi like formation of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) consisting of professionals to investigate the Pathankot attack, crackdown against the militant group Jaish-i-Mohammad—lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) in relation to the incident, India failed in providing any proof of Pakistan’s involvement in the Pathankot episode.
Indian authorities did not cooperate with Pakistan’s Joint Investigation Team which visited India to probe into Pathankot attack. The JIT members visited Pathankot Airbase on March 29 where Indian National Investigation Agency officials briefed and showed them the route from where the attackers stormed the airbase. In fact, besides fulfilling other sinister designs against Pakistan, New Delhi staged that drama to postpone secretary-level talks with Pakistan, which were scheduled to be held in Islamabad on January 15, 2016.
Sources said that the lights along the 24-km perimeter wall of the Pathankot airbase found to be faulty on the eve of the attack. The Pakistani investigators were allowed to enter the military airbase from the narrow adjacent routes instead of main entrance and their duration of the visit was just 55 minutes, enough to take a mere walk through the airbase. The JIT could not collect evidence in this limited time. And the visiting team was only informed about the negligence of Boarder Security Force (BSF) and Indian forces. It was disclosed that at the time of the assault, the BSF was sleeping, even though they had been alerted of a possible attack 48 hours earlier.
India’s orchestrated drama of the Pathankot incident could also be judged from the fact that earlier, Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar had stated in confusion that New Delhi would not allow access to the JIT into the base, though it was allowed on very limited scale to fulfill the formality. It can undermine the seriousness of bilateral commitments to find the truth.
Continuing false flag operations, on September, 2016, India also staged the drama of the terror attack in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) at a military base in Uri, close to the Line of Control (LoC) with Pakistan.
Like the previous terrorism-related events, without any investigation, Indian media, civil and military high officials started blaming LeT and ISI, saying that the militants who target the Uri base came from Pakistan’s side of Azad Kashmir. In this regard, a senior Home Ministry official and a spokesman of the Indian army allegedly said, “It is clearly a case of cross-border terror attack…the militants infiltrated across the Line of Control from Pakistan before attacking the base in Uri.”
The situation developed in the aftermath of the Uri base terror assault like creation of Indian war hysteria against Pakistan, mobilisation of troops near the LoC, exposure of the myth of Indian surgical strikes inside Azad Kashmir, differences between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Country’s Army Chief Gen. Dalbir Sing about the ‘fake video’ of this episode, criticism Modi government inside India, continuous violations at the LoC, targeting villages of Azad Kashmir etc., and diversion of attention from the new phase of uprising in the Indian held Kashmir where Indian security forces have martyred more than 600 innocent Kashmiris since July 8, 2016, who have been protesting against the martyrdom of the young Kashmir leader Burhan Wani by the Indian security forces in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) in wake of continued sieges and prolonged curfew have clearly proved that with the help of Indian intelligence agencies, especially RAW, India has itself arranged the Uri base assault not only to defame Pakistan abroad, but also to achieve a number of sinister designs.
Nevertheless, all these terror attacks were planned by Indian security agencies to distort image of Pakistan and its primary intelligence agency, ISI, linking it with the banned group Lashkar-e-Taiba. In these terms, coordinated terror assaults of November 26, 2008 in Mumbai were part of the same Indian scheme.
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com


Sunday, November 25, 2018

Attack on the Chinese Consulate: Main Target is Pak-China CPEC Project (JR83 SS01) By Sajjad Shaukat











Attack on the Chinese Consulate: Main Target is Pak-China CPEC Project (JR83 SS01)
                                                      By Sajjad Shaukat

Pakistan’s security forces successfully foiled an attack on the Chinese consulate in Karachi on November 23, this year.

In the exchange of firing, two policemen were martyred, including two civilians, as three gunmen tried to enter the consulate around 9:30am but were intercepted by security guards at a checkpoint.

Karachi Police Chief Dr Amir Shaikh said, “Three suspected suicide bombers were killed before they were able to enter the facility as forces successfully foiled the attack...They could not even get in the compound. They tried to get into the visa section…The men came to the consulate in a car which was loaded with explosives.”
The clearance operation was initially led by a female Police Officer Assistant Superintendent of Police Suhai Talpur. Her courage has been greatly appreciated by the top officials of Pakistan.

On the same day, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said, “All staff members of the Chinese consulate remained safe in the attack...It was a cowardly attempt by terrorists.”

The Director General of the Inter Services Publication Directorate (ISPR), Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor also confirmed by saying, “Terrorists attempted to enter Chinese consulate. Rangers and police have got control. Three terrorists killed. All Chinese are safe”. He also stated, “Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa expressed grief at the martyrdom of two policemen in the attempted attack on the Chinese consulate in Karachi’s Clifton area, hailing their sacrifice for the greater cause of protecting the citizens.”

While ordering an immediate inquiry regarding the assault on the Chinese consulate in Karachi, Prime Minister Imran Khan condemned the attack, terming it as a conspiracy against Pak-China economic and strategic relations. He stated, “The elements and motives behind this attack should be uncovered…the nation is proud of the prompt action of the Rangers and police…who were martyred foiling the attack.”

Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry condemned the assault on the Chinese consulate in Karachi and labeled it a “conspiracy”, targeting Pakistan-China socioeconomic and strategic ties.” He added, “Such incidents cannot hinder the friendship between the two neighbours.”

Almost all the leaders of the mainstream political and religious parties condemned the foiled assault on the Chinese consulate in Karachi and hailed the role of the security forces in this respect.

Besides, the Chinese Embassy in Pakistan, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang stated on the same day of the incident, “China strongly condemned the attack on its consulate in Karachi all consular staff and their families were safe following the shooting…We highly appreciate the efforts of the Pakistani side…The Chinese embassy in Pakistan has extended condolences over the martyrdom of two Pakistani policemen and said any attempt to undermine China-Pakistan friendship is doomed to fail…the attack would not affect Beijing’s commitment to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which seeks to connect its western province Xinjiang with the Arabian Sea port of Gwadar, in Balochistan….China and Pakistan are all-weather strategic partners.”

It is notable that a separatist group of the Balochistan province, the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility of the failed terror attempt on the Chinese consulate in Karachi through a tweet.  However, such claims of responsibility have no material value because all such anti-state elements always try to score numbers when an incident like this occurs.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s media and reliable sources disclosed that mastermind of terrorist attack on the Chinese consulate in Karachi—Aslam alias Achu is a commander of BLA and is currently receiving medical treatment at Max Hospital in the Indian capital New Delhi.

Undoubtedly, it shows the connections of the Indian secret agency RAW in relation to the foiled attempt at the Chinese consulate of Karachi.

In other terror-related incident, on the same day, at least 35 people were killed and 50 wounded in a blast in Kalaya area of lower Orakzai district in Hangu.

It is of particular attention that armed forces of Pakistan have successfully broken the backbone of the foreign-backed terrorists by the successful military operations Zarb-e-Azb and Radd-ul-Fasaad which have also been extended to other parts of the country, including Balochistan. And Pakistan’s primarily intelligence agency, ISI has broken the network of these terrorist groups by capturing several militants, while thwarting a number of terror attempts. But, in the recent past and during the election-campaign of 2019, blasts in Balochistan and other regions of the country, including the latest ones in Hangu and especially at the Chinese consulate in Karachi show that the US-led India, Afghanistan and Israel have again started acts of sabotage especially to destabilize Pakistan and to damage the CPEC which is their main target— particularly of India and America.  

Notably, the assassination of religious clear Maulana Samiul Haq, known as the “Father of the Taliban” on November 2, this year in Islamabad was part of the same scheme to weaken Pakistan, also due to the fact that Pakistan is the only nuclear country in the Islamic World.

It is mentionable that during the successful four-day visit of Premier Khan to China, Beijing on November 2, 2018, reportedly agreed to provide USD 6 billion in aid to cash-strapped Pakistan to minimise its dependence on an IMF bailout package. A loan of USD 1.5 billion is also expected to be offered, along with an additional package of USD three billion for CPEC. The loan and the investments were reportedly part of the USD six billion package. According to the joint statement, released on November 4, 2018, the two sides also signed fifteen Agreements/MoUs on a range of bilateral issues.
Pakistan and China also agreed to trade in their local currencies in an effort to reduce dependence on the US dollar. Particularly, Pakistan will save more than 12 billion dollars annually by importing goods in its local currency.

It is noteworthy that it is first time in the history of Pakistan that on November 20, 2018, the government led by P.M Imran Khan refused to accept tough conditions laid down by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a financial bailout package. Besides, other tough conditions such as further increase in power tariffs, imposition of more taxes etc., especially, the condition of sharing details related to Chinese financial assistance was also rejected. In fact, IMF is controlled by America, which has always imposed tough conditions to release loans in order to further destabilize Pakistan by targeting the general masses.  

It is also of particular attention that India was openly opposing the CPEC and China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) or BRI; the US also joined New Delhi. In this context, on October 3, 2017, US Defence Secretary James Mattis told the Lawmakers, “The United States has reiterated its support for India’s opposition to China’s One Belt, One Road initiative…the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a part of which traverses Pakistan-Kashmir.”

Islamabad strongly dismissed the statement from the American defence chief that the multibillion-dollar road and rail network “CPEC which is part of China’s One Belt, One Road initiative, passes through a disputed territory of Kashmir”, urging “the international community to focus on blatant human rights violations and heinous crimes committed by Indian occupation forces in the Indian Occupied Kashmir” (IOK), and reminded the US that Washington had also participated in an OBOR summit.

Earlier, a statement from the Chinese foreign ministry also dismissed Mattis’ statement, saying that the OBOR plan was backed by the United Nations and that CPEC was an economic cooperation initiative.

In this regard, repeated threats of the US President Donald Trump and top American officials to Islamabad and other moves like suspension of latter’s aid were part of the same scheme to thwart the CPEC.

The fact is that Indian lobbies which are well-penetrated in the US administration and Europe, research centers, think tanks and so-called human rights groups utilize the media tools in defaming Pakistan internationally. Especially, Indian RAW is availing the opportunity of the US-led organized propaganda campaign against Pakistan. Now, CPEC is special target of these hostile entities.

The reality is that when Gwadar seaport becomes fully operational, it would connect the landlocked Central Asian states with rest of the world. Being the commercial hub, the port is likely to increase volume of trade, bringing multiple economic and financial benefits to Pakistan like the Suez Canal which changed the destiny of Egypt when Israel returned it to the former. It will enable high-volume cargo vessels to move in the major oceans. Gwadar project which is backbone of the CPEC will uplift the impoverished people of Balochistan and Gilgit-Baltistan, including developments in other provinces by providing thousands of employment opportunities, particularly to the less developed areas by redressing their grievances. The resulting prosperity in Balochistan and Gilgit-Baltistan would damp the separatist sentiments of the people, which the hostile elements, supported by the US, India and Israeli do not want. Therefore, these entities and their media describe the CPEC in negative terms.

As a matter of fact, since the occupation of Afghanistan by the US-led NATO forces, the country has become center of CIA, RAW and Israeli Mossad which are in connivance to obtain the covert designs of the their countries and some Western countries against Russia, China, Pakistan and Iran. Under the cover of fighting terrorism, these foreign agencies which are also in collaboration with the Afghan intelligence agency National Directorate of Security (NDS), support the militants of ISIS and Afghanistan-based Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), including their linked outfits which have been conducting terror-assaults in Afghanistan and Pakistan as part of the secret strategy of the US-led countries. Besides, these terrorist outfits are weakening Tibetan regions of China and Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan through subversive activities.

Notably, on March 24, 2016, Pakistan’s security forces disclosed that they arrested the serving agent of RAW in Balochistan. During investigation and in a video, shown on Pakistan’s TV channels, RAW agent Kulbushan Yadav confessed that “he was the agent of RAW” and “during his stay, he contacted various Baloch separatist leaders and insurgents, including Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, to execute the task to damage the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor” project. Yadav admitted that he spied for India and was “assigned with the task to create unrest in Karachi and Balolchitan.”

Nevertheless, one has to evoke as to who could be the prime beneficiary of such an action against the Chinese in Pakistan. These are those elements who do not want to see Pakistan– China cooperation which has put the country on the road to progress.

In this connection, P.M. Imran Khan’s very successful visit to China and the advancements in the CPEC are of great distress and discomfort for those who do not want to see such initiatives, taking place between the two countries. In simple words this attack at the Chinese consulate was an attack on the CPEC and Pak-China friendship.

It is worth-mentioning that Karachi, the financial capital of Pakistan, reportedly has number of sleeping cells being operated by RAW, NDS and other hostile intelligence agencies. It is evident that the terrorist were part of these sleeping cells. Pakistan’s investigation units and intelligence agencies have already pointed out that such cells are being operated by RAW, NDS and other hostile agencies in Karachi.

In the recent years, these anti-Pakistan secret agencies have been conducting frequent attacks on the Pakistani forces and Chinese manpower working in Pakistan as well as on projects being completed under CPEC is going to change the fate of the people of this region especially Pakistan.

China and the US are pitched against each other on trade war. Asia and especially this region, being the economic future of the world, have gained attention of the world powers. This is the reason, why America has been spending billions of dollars just to stay in Afghanistan, despite the tremendous reverses being faced by the Americans. This interest goes till the extent where the US is now ready to even negotiate with their biggest adversary, the Talibans, just to maintain their presence in Afghanistan under the nose of China and Pakistan.

India being the collation partner of the US has opened 22 consulates in Afghanistan to counter the economic prosperity of Pakistan and CPEC and for working hands in glove with the NDS to generate unrest in Pakistan through sabotage and terrorism.

It means that being the future economic hub, this region; particularly Pakistan could face more terrorism-related events in the coming days. So, it is in their collective interests that both Islamabad and Beijing should remain focused on their economic goals and remain steadfast to meet similar future challenges.  

Again, it is pointed out that initial operation at the Chinese consulate was led by a female Police Officer ASP Suhai Talpur, which proves that Pakistani girls and women folks are on the forefront to defeat evil designs of CIA-RAW-NDS nexus.

We can conclude that the CPEC is the main target of the foiled attack on the Chinese consulate in Karachi.

Note: I have updated my similar article.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations



Saturday, November 24, 2018

Marble Industry of Pakistan (JR82)

















Marble Industry of Pakistan (JR82)
Introduction
Pakistan has at its disposal a large range of natural stones suitable to be cut and polished and used as decorative building materials, tiles and smaller decorative articles. There are rich deposits of: dark green jade, light green onyx rarely found elsewhere in the World except Argentina and Turkey Ordinary marble is available in good quality and sufficient quantity. It is exported in forms of un-worked raw blocks, polished and unpolished slabs and tiles. Marble and onyx are used in Pakistan to produce a wide range of decorative and desk products which are appreciated in the world for both quality and design. Natural Stones of Pakistan are acknowledged world wide as best in quality, variety and color, marble sand stone and onyx are exclusive and unique in its shades and not found in any other region of the world.
Pakistani natural onyx marbles tiles are praised internationally and products attract the world architects and builders who wish to give more artistic look to their designs. Pakistani marble manufacturer are making varieties of floor and wall tiles, mosaic tile, sinks and basin pedestals, column slabs blocks bathroom accessories, table tops onyx and marble handicrafts products in competitive prices to capture the international market.

Status Quo
Italy the world leader in marble and stone related products uses a large amount of raw materials from Pakistan, materials that are not available in their own quarries. Today a considerable export market for a wide range of products rests unexploited. Foreign exchange can be earned by ceasing to export raw blocks and exporting finished products-.This is due to:
-       Generally imperfect production of final products due to obsolete and inappropriate machinery and knowhow which leads to: lot of wastage of very precious materials because of inappropriate machines and production planning;
-          Waste of time during the sawing process of blocks of very different sizes on expensive machinery; and the export of raw blocks because of the lack of equipment.
-       The biggest disadvantage of exporting raw materials is   there was ‘growth but it had no contribution in creating jobs or in the development of the sector You don’t need many people to dig up mines. When you set up a factory, you employ people; but if you just mine, you don’t need to set up a factory or employ to many people.
-       Crude manner in which marble deposits are mined by blasting which causes: considerable waste and breakage; cracks in blasted blocks and deposits; and in-homogeneity of size of blocks:

 Raw Materials

Marbles are generally composed of CaCO3 with minor amount of other impurities which cause change of color which vary from white ( pure limestone) to brown, yellow , reddish (metal oxides) or grey to black graphite or green chlorites also called onyx .  Pakistan processes large deposits of so called “Indian red” granite for which considerable demand exists in the world. Nearly 30 kinds of marble were found in the province and the adjoining tribal belt. The most famous of these are Ziarat marble, super-white, off-white, Badal, Zebra, pink, Nowshera, Jet-black, Bampokha and golden marble
Swat, Buner, Chitral, Kohistan, Mardan, Hazara, Nowshera and Kohat divisions are high potential areas for quality marble in the province. Mohmand, Khyber, Bajaur, Orakzai and Kurram Agencies from Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) have huge marble reservoirs.
Pakistan has major deposits of high quality marble and granite in a wide range of colors, shades and patterns
Marble and onyx reserves are found largely in Mohmand Agency, Chitral, Buner, Swat, Parachinar, Gilgit, Hunza, Swabi, Bajour, Mardan, Wazirstan, Azad Kashmir, Lasbela, Chagai and Khuzdar. The biggest onyx reserves are said to be in Chaghai District in quarries largely owned by members of the Zehri tribe. Meanwhile, the report lists Gilgit, Dir, Chitral, Swabi, Kohistan, Nagarparker, Chagai, Mansehra, Malakand and Swat as places where granite deposits exist. However, the only known sources of “workable granite” according to this official report are in Nagarparkar and Mansehra.
Pakistan’s annual quarry production is 3.82 million tons. According to a province-wise break up; K-P’s production is 1.7 million tons, Baluchistan 1.4 million tons, FATA 0.5 million tons, Sindh 0.17 million tons and Punjab 0.0525 million tons. There are hundreds of names for different types of marbles. Most famous are sunny white, sunny black, buticinna, zebra, badal, ziarat and many more.
Pakistan is the 6th largest mineral extractor of marble and granite in the world. In spite of the huge size of the deposits and the long-term export potential, the country’s annual production of such stones has stagnated at around 2.5m tonnes, which contributes merely 2pc to the global market.


Reserves

Pakistan is estimated to have around 297bn tonnes of marble and granite reserves, mainly in the remote areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Fata, Balochistan and rural Sindh. Onyx, a rare marble, is abundant in the Chagai district of Balochistan; its dark green variety is found in five countries only. Its reserves are estimated at 34m cubic meters.
According to another estimates, there are 160.2 million tons of marble reserves in the country out of which 98% are in NWFP. Granite reserves, only at one place in Northern areas show a total of 414 million tons while other reserves of granite are spread all over NWFP, Baluchistan and Sindh.. More than 1,225 quarries and 2,000 processing units are operational.

Almost all provinces in Pakistan have ornamental stone deposits in wide range of colors, shades and patterns. Initial estimates indicate 166 billion tonnes of marble reserves across Pakistan. In North West Frontier Province(NWFP) the Malakand, Mardan, Hazar, Peshawer and Kohat divisions are high potential areas where quarrying is already taking place. Mohmand Khyber, Bajaur, Orakzai, Kurrani agencies in FATA has considerable quantity of marble. Baluchistan has rich confirmed deposits of both marble and granite in Khuzdar and Mianwali. Sindh boasts of gold ( Black Gold) colored stone which is highly priced in the global market. Large deposits of Onyx are found in Pakistan. According to Geological survey of Pakistan, reserves of green onyx in Chaghai district, and of other shades in Peshawer region, total about 34 million cubic metres. Huge deposits of Pakistan’s world famous marble varieties, golden marble and coral marble are available in province of Sindh in Pakistan. Mines of golden marble are located in Sonda in district Thatta, situated 125 km from Karachi. The estimated deposits of golden marble amount to over 50 million tonnes. Mines of coral marble are located in Thano Bulla Khan in district Dadu, situated 200 km from Karachi. The mines contain over 75 million tonnes of coral marble

Pakistan, especially NWFP, possesses huge marble reservoir. , Pakistan has approximately 300 billion tons of marble reserves scattered mainly in NWFP, the tribal belt and Baluchistan. Around 98 percent of these reserves are believed to be in NWFP and FATA. Of late, much of the potential however hitherto remains to be exploited large deposits of Onyx are found in Pakistan. According to Geological survey of Pakistan, reserves of green onyx in Chaghai district, and of other shades in Peshawar region, total about 34 million cubic metres.
 Huge deposits of Pakistan’s world famous marble varieties, golden marble and coral marble are available in province of Sindh in Pakistan. Mines of golden marble are located in Sonda in district Thatta, situated 125 km from Karachi. The estimated deposits of golden marble amount to over 50 million tonnes. Mines of coral marble are located in Thano Bulla Khan in district Dadu, situated 200 km from Karachi. The mines contain over 75 million tonnes of coral marble. Most of the production of dimension stone in Pakistanis consumed in the domestic market, leaving a small percentage for export. 
According to an estimate of Pakistan Stone Development Company (PASDEC), 297 billion tons of Marble and Granite reserves are available in the country. More than 1,225 quarries and 2,000 processing units are operational. There are over 70 types of natural color marble and granite currently.
Pakistan’s marble resources are spread largely across three provinces: KP, Balochistan and Punjab. Some quarries also exist in Sindh and parts of Gilgit-Baltistan. A report published around 2010 by the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP) estimates marble and onyx reserves to be more than 300 billion tonnes while granite reserves are estimated to be 1,000 billion tonnes. In comparison, marble reserves in India are estimated to be 1,931 million tonnes.


PASDEC
Pakistan Stone Development Company (PASDEC) was established in 2006 as a not for profit Company under section 42 of the Companies Ordinance 1984. The Company is a subsidiary of Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) working under the auspices of Ministry of Industries & Production (MOIP) and is mandated to initiate multiple projects to uplift the existing set-up of marble and granite sector. 

 Pasdec plans to upgrade 14 quarries, develop 20 marble cities and 2000 marble factories and establish 20 training centers of mosaic, inlays and stone masonry across the country.
Model quarries are being set up according to the best international practices for extracting stone and employing latest technology. Marble Cities are being established in the vicinity of mines all over Pakistan. The Ministry of Industries has opened a machinery pool at the newly established marble city Risalpur with the help of Pasdec.
  the marble city will have a common facility and training centers (CFTCs) for training local managers, workforce and technicians to cut square dimension blocks into slabs, then polish and cut them to size on the state of the art machinery. The centers will be run by both local and International experts. “CFTCs will also have a Mosaic Development Center to provide industrial training in marble mosaic, handicrafts and inlays from industrial waste. The common facility will provide cutting, polishing and sizing services as well on reasonable rates to private entrepreneurs. There would also be an industrial park on the site  
Pasdec is committed to make the sector globally competitive and socially responsible dimension stone industry by ensuring extraction of “square blocks” through modern techniques. “This strategy will transform this industry in to a globally competitive industry and an engine of economic growth for the country. We hope to increase exports to $2.5 billion through the steps by the year 2016,” said a Pasdec official.
. He said we intend to utilize the marble powder for building blocks if facilitated. “We also would be developing the mosaic marble industry in the province. Very beautiful pieces can be prepared from what once were considered waste of marble,” he said.

PASDEC is establishing 4 marble cities besides setting up of 10 model quarries in various parts of the country such as in FATA, Lora Lai, Risalpur and Chitral, which is supposed to generate revenue of over Rs. 1 billion every month. The Pakistan Government also has plans to extend marble city projects to three more cities which include Karachi, Islamabad and Guddani.



Marble Factories

Over 1,400 quarries and 3,000 processing units are operational in the country, employing about 30,000 workers. There were only six marble factories   in the marble sector in 1990 now there are around 1700 of them in NWFP and FATA that provide 0.1 million direct and another 0.6 million indirect jobs to people. The sector generates an estimated millions of revenue annually for the government

Market Aspects and exports

Pakistan has at its disposal an ideal combination of huge quantities of good quality raw material and abundant work forced permitting price levels that would be competitive in world markets. Various types of stones and marbles found in Pakistan would be of interest to international buyers. In the past exports from Pakistan was only raw materials but gradually, due to imposition of export tax, handicrafts became a part of exports ., finished marble article prices comprise 65% as wages of workers and is therefore of great importance to Pakistan where there is wide spread unemployment . The fact that Pakistan exports raw materials which have a relatively low wage content in its price suggests that the value added option is of great importance to the country.

The global trade in marble and granite was estimated at $45 billion a year. But marble exports from Pakistan were only about $33 million last year. The export during the last four years has significantly increased in marble and granite sector, which is estimated at US $ 35,814,000  The industry has huge potential in export sector and   exports can be increased up to $300   Exports could even touch one billion dollars if sustained efforts are made. The government and private sector would have to do streamline supply of raw materials as well as address the inability to cater to high volume orders from abroad  India is a big market for the marbles. It's mines at Makrana (from where the Marbles of Taj Mahal came) is drying and now it is importing marbles from as far as Italy. Develop your mines and find a readymade market next to you.
A simultaneous development came in 2006 when Pakistan and China inked a Free Trade Agreement, which came into effect a year later. The FTA turned the (export) tariff rates into “preferential” ones for China — not zero but not the lucrative sums that ought to have been charged either. With the Chinese entering the marble sector, quarry owners began holding direct dialogue and transactions with them. Production was stemmed to meet Chinese demand — quarry owners felt that the Chinese would pay them higher rates for the marble mined. Data available with the Federal Bureau of Statistics shows that marble exports had started declining since 2005 before it went up later. Combined with low tariffs at the border, taking marble to China became simpler and arguably more lucrative too.
En masse dumping of marble in the international market meant that the prices came down. And with prices driven downwards, Pakistani exporters began competing amongst themselves. As negative as the impact of this competition was, it’s not this anarchy that hurt the sector the most.
What “ruined the industry” — a recurring phrase in almost all interviews conducted — and continues to do is the wholesale exports of marble blocks (raw marble mined out of quarries in the shape of square blocks) to China to feed its construction appetite.
We have a marble known as Black and Gold, which sells a lot in China. Five years ago, it was selling at 375 US dollars. An equivalent Italian marble called Portoro was selling at more than 1,000 US dollars. Today the price of Black and Gold is down to 125 US dollars while Portoro has gone from 1,000 to 2,500 US dollars
 Some Pakistani marble has the same characteristics as Italian marble, the difference stems from no official oversight on extraction, supply and marketing. In recent times, for example, the Canalgrande quarries in Italy have been featured on the international media as the place from where some 65,000 tonnes of marble are extracted every year. In comparison, the medieval technology of blasting is all that Pakistan has to show at its mines.
“The Italians built that image, they know how to market their product,” argues Hashwani. “Unfortunately in Pakistan, most stakeholders started competing against each other.”
The consequences of the unhindered outflow of marble blocks are manifold. The immediate impact is the “unavailability of raw materials” Even if the raw material is available, Pakistani buyers have to compete with Chinese buyers for their own natural resources, which most cannot afford given the rise in prices due to Chinese demand.
Local buyers are left with “second and third-rate categories of marble, We get blocks that are potato-shaped that need more work to cut. About 80 percent or so is just useless. After cutting it from six sides to turn it into a square block, we are only left with a small amount that’s usable.”
“China is the biggest importer of marble from Pakistan, however, the marble exported to China also includes semi-processed marble, which is then re-exported from China after value addition, which is hurting Pakistan’s marble industry to a significant extent,” cites a research report compiled by the State Bank of Pakistan titled Marble and Marble By-products.
“What adds to this loss of marble in production is the fact that a majority of our mining is done through blasting,” says Hashwani of this primitive method of mining. “About 80 percent of the marble is wasted.”
“China, on the other hand, gets to have square blocks It also pays no export duty to Pakistan, and the freight the Chinese pay to transport the material on ship is just 50 dollars per container”. The most consequential impact of the export of raw marble to China is that it’s simply preventing the local industry from developing value-adding capacity. As it stands, the marble industry is basically a trading industry,”  , which is “not helping the country at all.”
Open-ended policies mean that just as there is no control over exports, there’s no check on what’s being imported either. Whereas the outflow is that of prime raw marble, the inflow is that of top-end finished products. Since the local industry’s growth is stunted and there’s no local value-addition, the import of value-added is a double-whammy. Forget foreign markets, Pakistani producers can’t even compete in their own country thanks to the influx of Spanish and Italian products.
This means that local producers are missing out on construction projects such as Bahria Town and DHA City. “Almost all of the marble being used in these projects is imported,”  Because any big project wants steady quality and consistency, they have a problem getting that here in Pakistan .
Our exporters, when they go and compete in the international market with China, they are competing with their own products. And we can’t even compete with it since we don’t have the capacity to process our own raw materials. China accounts for 60pc of Pakistan’s total marble exports. China and Italy purchase raw products like slabs and blocks and re-export value-added items like mosaic work, inlay designs and tiles around the world, including to Pakistan.
Russia and the US, as well as Middle Eastern and European countries demand finished marble products, and thus constitute less than 10pc of our export. Saudi Arabia alone imports marble products worth $1,500m. This indicates the dire need for developing technology to capture value-added export markets.
The overall marble sector export stood at $39.46 million during July-June 2017, registered a decline of around $18.50 million as compared to the same period last year that stood at $57.97 million

Training and HR Development

Marble Mosaic Training in Islamabad: Pakistan Stone Development Company in collaboration with UNIDO launched a series of marble mosaic and inlay training sessions to promote skill development and entrepreneurship culture amongst women. The program generates opportunities of livelihood in remote and rural areas at economical cost of production. 

Demand

The number of countries importing marble and marble products from Pakistan is gradually increasing, major importers are: Japan; USA ‘, Saudi Arabia, Czech Republic; Singapore; UK ; and Finland., in that order . The demand in these countries is such that the supply of products can be increased Local and foreign importers of granite would welcome Pakistani granite.
Technological advances in the last seventy years had increased the world production and consumption of dimensional stones to 49.5 million tons.  Due to increase in world
Consumption the granite and marble international trade reached US$ 2.5 billion mark in 1999.  Italy  is  the  major  player  in  the  international  market  and  exported  38%  of  the dimensional stone’s exports, while its imports were 18% of the international imports. Other major exporters include Spain, Turkey and Portugal while major importers were USA, China,
Germany and Hong Kong.

Major International Players

India has been the main exporter of granite and sandstone for the last five years. Its exports have declined by 46% in five years but it managed to capture 15.11% of the granite trade in
1999. Norway, which had 12.15% of the export share and Italy, capturing 8.47% of granite market in 1999 were two other major exporters.
                      
Italy, Turkey, China, Brazil and Spain are the major players with a huge share of the marble and granite exports in the world market. Pakistan has only 0.05% share, which is less than our rival's, India.  Pakistan has an edge over India and China in quality marble and granite reserves but poor management of the resource means that we are squandering the resource .

Investment opportunities

Pakistan offers big investment opportunities in mining, value addition and manpower development in the sector. Recent reports suggest that Saudi Arabia is interested in Pakistani marble to build its new cities with an expenditure of around $260 billion. Italy and other countries, it is learnt, want barter trade of their marble machinery & technology in exchange for the Pakistani marble. All this shows great investment potential in Pakistan’s marble and granite sector.  

Technology requirements

The normal equipment in some of the quarries is: iron lever; quarry hammers; hand actuated winch. Quarries equipped with baby drills or small compressor and able to drill boreholes for charge placement are considered as well equipped. Lack of technical knowledge and lack of finances are the main reason for this. There is lack of cranes to handle the raw blocks. The exception has been onyx where on the insistence of foreign buyers the material is mined by means of modern methods

The processing and finishing sector is also equipped with sub standards machines. The local industry produces some of these machines but these are mostly shoddy copies and provide indifferent performance resulting in bad quality of the products.

The handicrafts industry is mainly located in Karachi mainly due to te fact that the main sales and distribution center for onyx from Baluchistan is there .Some of this work is world class These units that manufacture world class products show the way towards general excellence given education , finances and organization .

Problems faced by Marble Industry
Around 75 percent of the industrialist’s time was consumed by the ten different types of departments he had to deal with for his business. Reduction and simplification of the regulatory system would be of great benefit to the small businesses of the sector.
Current blasting practices hurt the industry as this causes 85% wastages whereas the Industry average is around 45%. The marble industry is suffering from load-shedding, low voltage, law and order problem, use of outdated quarrying techniques, inconsistent supplies of raw material, lack of proper infrastructure, lack of value addition and absence of public-private cooperation/coordination  
The irregularly shaped blocks are transported to considerable distances. The cost of the finished blocks is much larger than these should. For starters the blocks need to be processed as close to the mines as possible. These areas need to have infrastructure improved.
Despite the poverty of the industry, it is the exports to China that have proven to the main boon for the Pakistani marble industry. During the peak years of exports to Pakistan’s neighbor to the north, however, the outflow of marble only served to weaken the country’s industry further. Even today, despite the changes in Chinese policies, Beijing remains the worlds, and Pakistan’s, top buyer of marble. The irony, however, is that the Pakistani marble sector continues to suffer as a result. What explain this decline is the intertwined factors of the export orientation of the industry, the absence of regulation, and lack of focus on value addition. 
Pakistani exporters have demanded the inclusion of semi-processed marble in the Sino Pak Free Trade Agreement (FTA) as currently the export of raw material to China is not benefiting the marble industry. Pakistan sends almost 50 percent of its marble exports to China and this huge share of export is based on the raw material which is zero rated under the FTA. The raw material currently being exported to China is re-exported from China after value addition which is hurting the marble industry in Pakistan.

The problems faced by the marble industry are summarized s follows:

-       Quality and size of the blocks quarried in the first place
-       Separation of production of raw materials and finishing add transport costs
-       Low efficiency of finishing units
-       Bad quality of finished products related to : surface polishing ; exact measures ; qualities of accessories in case of finished products
-       Infrastructure lacking in mining areas
-       Trade agreements with China that are inimical to development o of the sector in Pakistan
-      Lack of a collective organization that is responsible for standards, norms, correct pricing and marketing in cooperation with the Export Promotion Bureau
-      Aggressive international marketing efforts in way of trade fairs, exposition f samples
-      Speculation by persons not interested in the industry in way of: quarry licenses; export of raw materials instead of finished products; and general export prices.
-       
-       
Way Forward

The government must improve the power infrastructure, water, sewerage and road networks. It should ensure soft loans to the potential investors to enable them get modern quarrying machinery. The government should open a mineral development bank for the sector.  It should also help establish training centers for workforce and a safe and healthy environment, the ministry of industries and private sector should join hands to explore more marble sites, develop marble industry on modern lines and open marble processing units in areas where the treasures are located. This will help bring the transportation cost down, create job opportunities for locals and would develop most of these backward areas. Steps: to promote the stone industry by streamlining and modernizing it; for processing blocks and slabs by cutting, sizing, polishing and inlay-designing. Marble miners should stop method of blasting and get the latest machinery on rental basis for extracting marble. Standard wastage in the world is 45 percent for the marble sector. In Pakistan, blasting destroys 85 percent marble in mining. Wire-cutting-technology would be provided to the miners on rental basis to avoid wastage of marble
Lack of slabs of internationally acceptable quality and the low polishing and finishing quality of the material produced. are the main reasons for the low performance of the industry.

In a recent letter the All Pakistan Marble Mining Processing Industry & Exporters Association (APMMPIEA) has demanded that the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan and Ministry of Commerce include the semi-processed or un-finished marbles like tiles, slabs and other items, into the zero rated list of Pakistan-China FTA to support the local industry. The letter said”China is one of our biggest buyer of marble but its purchases are only limited to raw material (Squared Marble, Granite and Onyx Blocks), which is not helping our Industry

There should be an export quota: only 30 percent of the exports should be of marble blocks whereas 70 percent of the exports should only be of added-value materials produced locally. A change in the import policy, in line with the demand of change on the export policy, namely that which allows the local industry to move from trading marble to processing it. There should be duty on imports of finished products Net phase of CPEC should include transfer of Chinese marble industry to Pakistan so that raw material os processed and then exported.



Suggestions are given below to help the country realize its potential as a ‘stone exporter’.
• Upgrade operational and abandoned quarries and processing units. Locally manufactured machinery has been employed in hundreds of processing units that need to be upgraded and modernized to meet international quality standards.
Likewise, handling, cutting, storing and transportation must be significantly improved. Production volumes must be expanded to match the availability of exploitable reserves in line with market demands. For instance, Pakistan has granite reserves of over 2bn tonnes; however, average annual production is limited to 6,000 tonnes only.
• Adopt state-of-the-art mining technologies, as the current blasting practices in Pakistan cause a huge loss of precious stone. Benchmarking with global quarrying performance shows that the standard wastage of marble in the world is 45pc, whereas it is 85pc here. Mine-operational performance could be improved and financial losses due to wastages minimized by introducing latest technologies.
• Develop infrastructure in areas where the stone deposits are located. The quarrying sector cannot be developed and expanded without basic infrastructural facilities such as electricity, road network and security. In fact, around 98pc of the dimension stone deposits are located in KP and Fata, which have been impacted by the war against terrorism over the last many years. The government needs to do something about this. The fact that transportation costs and other costs are huger than what these should be needs to be investigated and mitigated.
• Market reports indicate that Saudi Arabia is interested in Pakistani marble to build its new cities. And Italy and some other European countries want to sell their marble machinery and technology in exchange for Pakistani marble. According to the Pakistan Stone Development Company, exports of dimension stones could touch $2.5bn within a few years if sustained efforts are made to overcome bottlenecks.
• Facilitate investors to overcome power shortages; the erratic power crisis is a gigantic obstacle in attracting investments. Most of the existing dimension-stone processing units have been compelled to work on 5pc of installed capacity due to hours of load-shedding. For instance, to meet the industrial power needs, investors must be encouraged to install and maintain their own coal-power plants.  
• Introduce business-friendly laws and capacity-building initiatives. The government can help establish training centers for the workforce and provide a safe and healthy work environment. Skilled manpower could play a cutting edge role in optimizing quarrying operations and processing units. And local laws for exploration and exploitation of dimension stones should supplement these efforts.
.
Conclusion

The government of KP is suggested to utilize the funds made available from “Profit on Hydel Generation” upon development of the marble and granite sector in the province instead of using these funds to build more hydropower plants. The switch will result in significant increase in jobs and in development of the Province.
Funds provided should : provide training ; provide subsidized modern machinery; and develop infrastructure of the mingy areas . Government should also freshly negotiate the trade agreement with China related to Marble and precious stones sectors.

Business community demands govt’s focus on marble sector

Call for restoring fixed tax regime


Our CorrespondentApril 24, 2022
PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:

In order to optimise the tax collection and broaden the tax base, the government should re-introduce the fixed tax regime for the marble industry on the pattern of the tier-II retailers who pay sales tax through electricity bills, suggested Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICCI) President Muhammad Shakeel Munir.

In a statement on Saturday, he said that effective from June 2016, the marble industry was paying a fixed sales tax at Rs1.25 on per unit of electricity consumed as a final discharge of its net sales tax liability to the extent of marble and granite manufacturing, grinding and polishing process.

“However, the Finance Act 2020 abolished this regime and the marble industry is now subject to the normal sales tax at 17% due to which, the growth and expansion of this industry is suffering,” he said. “The government should re-introduce the fixed tax regime for the marble industry in the next budget which will pave the way for its better growth and increase the overall tax collection from this sector as people would willingly pay the fixed tax.”

Munir said that according to a research study, Pakistan possessed over 292 billion tons of marble reserves and 99% of them existed in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) region. He added that Buner, Mardan, Swabi, Nowshera, Mansehra, Malakand and Chitral districts were rich in marble.

According to him, substantial investment was required for developing a mine as per the international standards. He emphasised upon the government to devise a mechanism to provide financial support to the investors of the marble industry to enable them to import the required equipment and machinery for producing value-added marble products and boosting exports.

The ICCI president lamented that roads in the marble extraction areas were not properly developed and the necessary infrastructure such as electricity, colonies for the workers and transportation arrangements was insufficient.

“Due to these problems, the transportation costs of blocks from quarries to processing units increases the production cost considerably which affects the market trends,” he said. “The government should look into the issues of the marble industry and address them so that this industry can grow rapidly and play a more effective role in the economic development of the country.”

ICCI Senior Vice President Jamshaid Akhtar Sheikh and Vice President Muhammad Faheem Khan said that lack of research and development culture in the mining sector was another major problem of this sector.

They urged the government to cooperate in setting up research and development facilities for the marble industry and argued that they would go a long way in promoting this important industry and increase its contribution in the development of the national economy.