Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Regulating the Global Spyware Market Won’t Be Easy Emily Taylor (JR 239 ET 01)

Regulating the Global Spyware Market Won’t Be Easy Emily Taylor | Tuesday, July 27, 2021

                                                         

 Like picking up a rock in the garden, the NSO Pegasus spyware scandal exposes a repulsive world teaming with life in the muck and mire—so much so that it is tempting to put the stone back in place and pretend that world doesn’t exist. There are many layers to the story: the human cost, the murky ethics of selling powerful spy tools to states with poor human rights records, and the complexities of trying to regulate the global market for such software. They all point to a challenge that will be with us for some time, despite the popular outrage the scandal has caused. The stories of the human cost are awful. Take Cecilio Pineda Birto, a Mexican journalist who wrote about corruption (http://theguardian.com/news/2021/jul/18/revealed-murdered-journalist-number-selected-mexico-nso-client-cecilio-pineda-birto) and whose phone number appears on a leaked list of 50,000 numbers that is reportedly a master list of phones targeted by NSO Group’s clients using Pegasus software. Pineda was shot dead as he waited for his car to be washed. He was 38 years old. Reading about his death, it’s impossible not to wonder whether the NSO Pegasus tool’s ability to track a target’s location, or turn on a smartphone’s camera and microphone to film and eavesdrop on them, played a part in helping his killers to track him down. And who was the customer? Was it the Mexican state, or a drug cartel? Could the answer have been both? Pineda’s murder is just one of many stories, from Morocco’s intelligence agency spying on French President Emmanuel Macron, to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan and other governments allegedly using NSO’s technology to target human rights lawyers, activists and journalists (http://washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2021/nso-spyware-pegasus-cellphones/)—citizens and non-citizens alike, at home and abroad. That authoritarian states use surveillance technologies to spy on those who seek to expose their corruption and rights abuses is outrageous, but regrettably, it is nothing new. This privatized, opaque and global market for spyware, in which multibillion-dollar firms like Israel’s NSO work with intelligence agencies and governments all over the world, regardless of their human rights records, is the “bugs under the rock” moment (/) 28/07/2021 There Are No Easy Answers to the NSO Pegasus Software Scandal https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/29835/there-are-no-easy-answers-to-the-nso-pegasus-software-scandal 2/5 revealed by the Pegasus scandal. The surveillance technologies in question do have legitimate law enforcement uses, for instance to track terrorist groups or organized crime. But there appear to be few, if any, effective checks and balances to ensure that such powerful tools are not used for the purposes of repression. NSO is not the only actor implicated in the broader repercussions of this scandal. Other vendors sell spyware, and those sales are subject to export licenses granted by states—in this case, Israel. Last year, in a little reported development, a Tel Aviv court refused an application supported by Amnesty International to revoke NSO’s export license (https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/07/israel-court-notorious-spyware-firm-nso/) due to past abuses of its software by states like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Morocco and Mexico. Much like the international arms trade, the market for spyware is a global one, and private actors are key suppliers to many governments. Marietje Schaake, a former European parliamentarian and the current president of the Cyber Peace Institute, has long campaigned against the export of “dual use” technologies, or goods, software and technology that can be used for both civilian and military applications, of which Pegasus is one example. She points out that private contractors such as NSO are often based in democracies such as Israel, yet sell spyware to regimes that are well known for violating human rights at their most basic level. In an interview with Tech Policy Press, Schaake condemned NSO’s response to allegations of abuse of the Pegasus spyware (https://techpolicy.press/the-sunday-show-surveillance-and-the-future-of-tech/) by authoritarian regimes as hypocritical “nonsense.” Speaking to me over the weekend, Schaake warned of another risk associated with the free trade in intelligence grade technologies: “It puts authoritarian regimes on a fast track to achieving competing capacity to that of democratic societies.” Much like the international arms trade, the market for spyware is a global one, and private actors are key suppliers to many governments. Western firms sell arms not only to NATO allies but also to friendly countries, such as Saudi Arabia, with well-documented records of repression and human rights abuses. These countries often have legitimate reasons for purchasing those weapons or spyware, as well as illegitimate, repressive ones. It is fair to question whether vendors should be the the arbiters of whether their state customers are lying to them about the intended use of these purchases. Campaigners against these surveillance tools have long pressed for updating the rules governing export controls on dual-use technologies, which are covered by the non-binding Wassenaar Arrangement, to include spyware. In May 2021, the European Parliament and European Council adopted a regulation to modernize the European Union’s system for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2021:206:FULL&from=EN). The regulation introduces 28/07/2021 There Are No Easy Answers to the NSO Pegasus Software Scandal https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/29835/there-are-no-easy-answers-to-the-nso-pegasus-software-scandal 3/5 due diligence obligations for producers of such goods and puts greater responsibility on those companies to address the risks to international security posed by the dual-use items they sell. Of course, export controls would not have prevented the import of Pegasus software by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/jul/18/viktor-orban-using-nso-spyware-in-assault-on-media-data-suggests), allegedly to spy on Hungarian investigative journalists. Edward Snowden has called for a ban on the global market for spyware (https://www.theguardian.com/news/video/2021/jul/19/edward-snowden-spyware-industry-should-not-exist-video), but he is a bit light on details for how such a ban should be enacted, given that the technology already exists out there and there are plenty of willing buyers. A United Nations report authored by David Kaye in 2019 similarly called for a moratorium on the global sales of spyware until more robust human rights protections are put in place (https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/28016/can-a-u-n-report-help-rein-in-expansive-and-abusive-digital-surveillance), but it generated little follow-up. I asked Sir David Omand, the former head of the British signals intelligence agency GCHQ and author of “How Spies Think,” what could be done to reduce the risks of abuse in future. Omand told me that reaching a universally accepted international agreement on spying and software would be “next to impossible.” But he does think that improvements in national requirements for due diligence prior to the sale and export of such technology could help, and that some well-established objective criteria could be used to navigate the decision-making process. “It is legitimate to sell tools for law enforcement or national security to countries that have in place protections for individual privacy rights, including transparent law, an independent judiciary, proper regulation and independent oversight,” he explained. The strength or weakness of such constraints will guide an assessment on the likelihood of future abuse. “Without such controls,” he added, “verification of how the technology is being used is problematic.” Change could also come from an unexpected source. Some Big Tech companies are using their deep pockets to mount legal challenges, threatening to hit NSO where it hurts most—in the wallet. WhatsApp is currently suing NSO for its alleged hacking of WhatsApp’s end-to-end encrypted chat app back in 2019. Even if the challenge fails, the litigation process is likely to shine some disinfecting sunlight on the murky world of surveillance tech. Unlike governments, tech companies are unlikely to also be potential or actual customers of NSO. What’s more, the spyware manufacturer is making some tech companies look bad. Alleged weaknesses in the security of Apple’s iPhone have received a lot of airtime over the past week. That’s bound to irritate a company that has made a major selling point of its commitment to user privacy and security. Apple did not join in a statement that several tech companies, including Microsoft and Cisco, filed in support of WhatsApp’s suit (https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/how-does-apple-technology-hold-up-against-nso-spyware/) stating that NSO’s actions make technology less safe for everyone. Perhaps in the future it ay hange its ind  https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/29835/there-are-no-easy-answers-to-the-nso-pegasus-software-scandal

  

Wednesday, July 14, 2021

Two child law: Not just Muslims, Lower Caste Hindus also the Target (JJ1 JR238)

 

Two child law: Not just Muslims, Lower Caste Hindus also the Target

 

In short, this law will further marginalize the already marginalized, will make the poor poorer and will further disempower the weakest sections of society. This is utterly inhuman and inherently dangerous for India’s future.

Dr. Javed Jamil


Two-child policy imposition through law appears to be the latest agenda of BJP state governments. After ban on “Love Jihad”, this appears to be another attempt to ensure that the domination of Hindus, especially the upper caste Hindus continues. In fact, the Hindutva is primarily a Banyawaadi agenda, which has little to do with the basics of Hindu Dharma and is largely interested in the economic domination of business community, which in India largely means Vaish community commonly known as Banyas.

 

While, from political point of view, introduction of this bill just before the elections in Uttar Pradesh is largely believed to be a communal ploy to unite Hindus behind BJP, in social terms, it may also be an attempt to keep the population of low caste Hindus, especially Dalits in control. They may feel concerned not only about a slightly higher population growth rate of Muslims but also a higher growth rate of the scheduled castes.  See the following report published in Times of India:

 

“Four states account for nearly half of the country's Dalit population, reveals the 2011 census. Uttar Pradesh stands first with 20.5% of the total scheduled caste (SC) population, followed by West Bengal with 10.7%, says the data released by the Union census directorate on Tuesday. Bihar with 8.2% and Tamil Nadu with 7.2 % come third and fourth. Dalits form around 16.6% of India's population. The 2011 census recorded nearly 20.14 crore people belonging to various scheduled castes in the country. As per the 2001 census, the number was 16.66 crore. The dalit population showed a decadal growth of 20.8%, whereas India's population grew 17.7% during the same period." (“Half of India’s Dalit population lives in 4 states”: Times of India; B Sivakumar May 2, 2013)

 

It can be argued that purely in terms of caste/communal equations; it will ultimately boomerang on Hindus, as the combined population of SCs and OBCs is much higher than that of Muslims. But it is exactly what the Hindutva is more concerned about. While on one hand, they do not want Muslims to prosper, they are also keen to maintain superiority of Upper Castes in general and Banyas in particular within the Hindu community. The proposed Bill by Uttar Pradesh Government will serve both their purposes. On the ground of this policy, they want to reserve more and more seats in colleges, jobs and administration for upper castes. Already, through the privatization of education, they have created a massive reservation for themselves, as it is mainly the children belonging to the upper castes who have enough riches to send their children in private colleges.

Even in terms of human values and health, the effects of the policy will be highly damaging. First, it will lead to sharp increase in abortions in general and female foeticide in particular. Both are already high on many parts of the country. With fewer women, long term effects can be highly dangerous leading to more polyandry and promiscuity Second, family system will get increasingly weakened with more and more people indulging in promiscuous life. This in turn will lead to more sex transmitted diseases including HIV/AIDS, which still kills more than 60000 every year in the country. 

 

The policy of severely strict population has already started boomerang in many countries. China has already abandoned its one child policy and people can now have three children. In Western societies, population growth is already negative and with homosexuality on rise it is bound to worsen more. They are relying on migration from other countries. This trend will continue to rise. Till now, people from countries like India and other third world countries have been providing a sizeable chunk of this migrant population in Western countries. In countries like the US and Canada, already people of Indian origin are making their presence felt through their achievements in various fields. With strict 2 child policy, Indians will lose this advantage.

 

As I have argued previously also, Hindutva is mainly helping Banyas, both in terms of caste domination (Vaish) and in business terms (businessmen)/. In Indian terms, my now well-known phrase of “economic fundamentalism” can easily be translated into “Baniyawaad” and Baniyas as the biggest economic fundamentalists. Brahamainwaad represented dominance of the power of “knowledge”; Baniyawaad represents dominance of the power of “money”

 It has been rather a fashion for long to say that Brahamins and Brahaminwaad continue to rule the country and it is they who are responsible for the majority of the problems of the country, especially the plight of the deprived sections of society. We have failed to realise that the balance has changed quite some time back. While the Upper Caste Hindus continue to monopolise India’s socio-economic structure and their hegemony is ever on the rise, it is not Brahamins and Brahaminwaad but banyas (Vaishyas) and Baniyawqaad that now reign supreme.

All the propaganda about “Appeasement” of Muslims, and to a lesser extent about the schemes favouring Dalits and OBC Hindus, emanate from the desire to continue the centuries-old domination of Upper Caste Hindus. In the remote past, Kshatriyas ruled with the help of the intellectual power of Brahamins and the Money Power of Baniyas (Vaishyas). Then Brahamins started ruling the country with the help of the money power of Baniyas and the Muscle power of Kshatriyas. More recently, Baniyas have taken the reins in their hands turning democracy into Corporatocracy, with the help of the intellectual power of a section (not all) of Brahamins and the muscle power of Kshatriysa. This is the most dangerous phase because when the money rules, morality soon gets cremated with full honours.

 

Not only the consumer industry is largely controlled by the Baniyas, even education industry is dominated by them. The mushrooming of tens of thousands of Private institutions of all kinds in the country has introduced another kind of Reservation — the Reservation for the Rich, which again hit the Muslim community in a big way because less number of Muslims is likely to be able to pay the exorbitant fees that good private institutions demand. Privatisation has also benefited Upper Caste Hindus on business front in a big way. Through them they earn huge money and get their children highly educated. And of course they get most of the jobs in private companies.

 

The role of Baniyas is also getting increasingly high in politics. While Congress had more Brahamins than Banyas, the BJP and its sister organisations are now being driven by the Baniyas. It is they who are running the BJP show. Hindutvavad is nothing but a movement that seeks economic and political hegemony of Baniyas through polarisation of politics on communal grounds.

 

The international population control campaign was in itself a market-driven programme It may be true that the population is growing at a rate considered fast by the experts. It may also be true that such rapid growth of population escalates several prob­lems. If the infectious diseases cause mortality and morbidity at alarming rates, the mothers still die during deliveries, a size­able percentage of infants do not remain alive to celebrate their first birthday and out of the rest many more die in their paediatric age owing to lack of nutritious food and unavailability of good medical care and cities are becoming overcrowded, the popula­tion growth may be a significant contributory factor. But there are other factors related with the issues that are conveniently forgotten. Disinformation is generously used to further the birth control programme. For example, the impression has been usually disseminated that a steep rise in population would create shortage of food. The studies by the organisations monitor­ing food production have been categorical in proving that the rise in food production in the last  seven decades has been great­er than the rise in population. If the people still starve it is because the food is not allowed to reach them. It can be said with confidence that if the distri­bution of food becomes equitable, no human being on the earth will remain hungry. The earth allows birth of only as many humans as it can sustain. The economic fundamentalists know this. This is why some economists have gone to the extent in their argument that increase in food production must not be allowed to occur because if the food production rises the population will naturally expand to consume it. It can therefore be the reason why the food is not allowed to reach all the corners of the earth; if it reaches all humans it would save many a lives from starvation. This would obviously cause an increase in population. Once there are no more deaths owing to starvation, the drive for population control will receive further setback. Why exactly the economic fundamentalists seek to keep population under control is ex­plained below.

Another point that has entirely been missed is that the total bio-mass of the earth remains the same. If the human population grows the population of animals would decrease; and if the human population is reduced by natural or artificial means the animal population would increase. The question arises: should we reduce the number of human beings and increase the population of beasts? If the human population has always continued to increase, it is because Nature wants to replace the less developed creatures with the better developed. Should we endeavour to interfere with this natural phenomenon? Similarly, in order to popularise family welfare programmes, the advertisements suggest that early marriage is detrimental to the health of the girl. This again may be disput­able; if Nature has made her physically capable to reproduce, the probability of damage to her body would be minimal, provided of course she takes adequate diet and receives appro­priate medical care, which is essential as well for the older mothers. Conversely, it has been very well documented by the gynaecologists that the chances of congenital abnormalities in children and certain kinds of malignancies (cancers) of women rise with increase in the age of the mothers. The best period for procreation is below thirty. Family welfare programmes are definitely worth following as far as their objective is to save the mothers and children from diseases and death; proper spacing is essential; avoidance of pregnancies in mothers who are ill or when their other children are not healthy and if the income of the family is too meagre to sustain a large family is also under­standable. But is the programme really aimed at alleviating the problems of the common people? Unfortunately not. There is much more to what meets the eyes. Behind the “mercifulness” for the poor are several undeclared motives.

One, by fixing the blame of every problem of the world on the population growth, the economic fundamentalists are able to divert the attention of the people from their own sinister games that are in truth responsible for the sweeping poverty. When less than five per cent have more than ninety per cent of the country’s income (and wealth) in India for example, how a growth of less than two percent per annum is going to aggravate the prob­lems? Despite the high rate of population growth, the country has become self-reliant in food production and is now in a position to export it. Yet the poverty haunts about half of the nation. Even if the population growth becomes zero, with the continuous flow of wealth from the poor to the rich and from the richer to the richest, would the situation show any signs of improvement even in decades? The situation warrants harsh measures and requires that the holders of the ninety per cent of the wealth of the country are made, either through force or through change in policies, to share the benefits of their wealth with the rest of the country­men. It is not the explosion of “population bomb” but that of the bomb of myth that frightens the economic fundamentalists; lest the people should know the truth, it is better to keep them engaged in debates on the adverse effects of population growth.

Two, the big industries know that a big family uses a big por­tion of its income in purchasing food items. Rest is utilised in purchasing clothes that too are usually of cheap variety produced by small industries. Little money is left with it to buy costly consumer goods manufactured by the big industry. It tends to assist agricultural growth (and that of small scale industry) at the cost of industrial growth. It is essential therefore that the size of the family remains small so that it can save enough money to bestow on the big industries.

Three, the popularisation of contraceptive devices through promo­tion of small family norms is a great boon for the industrialists. Through these programmes, men and women are informed and conditioned with the use of methods for avoiding unwanted pregnancies. This awareness helps the commercial sex. If women had not become fearless on this account, promiscuity could never have become common. Furthermore, through the marketing of various contraceptive devices, the industries earn billions.

Fourth, encouraging men and women to marry as late as possible again immensely benefits the market including sex market. The young working women in big numbers means opportunities for dating, which helps food, fashion, hotel and many other industries. Sex market too thrives. For the sustenance of the flesh-trade, demand and supply are essential; and if the people start marrying as soon as they attain puberty, the market would take a nosedive. It is hardly surprising therefore that, to achieve success in population control, encouragement to promiscu­ity has been advanced by the Western experts as a method to discourage people from early marriage. It is also for the same reason that the so-called champions of human rights do never raise their voice against the killing of millions of children by way of abortion every year. The truth is that the so-called family welfare programmes are aimed at the disintegration of the family system because the family system is not consistent with the “devel­opment” model. The weaker the family system the more likely the members of the family are to spend money in the consumer and sex-market helping the “development” in the process.

What is needed is the proper distribution in order to decrease all kinds of inequalities. Population Management rather than Population Control should be the ultimate aim. Even if population growth becomes zero, the problems will not ease. The big cities are getting increasingly crowded not mainly because of population growth but because of the migration from  the rural to urban and from smaller cities to bigger cities. Unless massive Rural Development programmews are not organised, the problems will not cease. Anmd of coursed, massive efforts and harsh steps are needed to reverse the rising Economic Inequality. There are many ways but the most effective way will be to replace Income Tax and GST with the Wealth Tax.

 

Specifically coming to India, it is high time the country understood the designs of the forces of Hegemony. Baniyawaad needs to be confronted in its ideological as well as practical forms. For this, all the right thinking persons will have to unite. The protagonists of Hindutva should know that Dalits, OBCs and most Muslims not only belong to the same class and have common ancestral roots but also share similar beliefs regarding secularism, justice and equality. Together these classes constitute around 90 pc of India, and you like it or not, it is they along with a large number of those upper caste members, who value secularism, equality and justice, who will play a dominant role in future India and will outsmart the forces of monopolization. Two Child Policy needs to be abandoned without delay. If upper castes are so wary of the decrease in their percentage in population, they must first aggressively attend the horrendous issue of Female Foeticide. With two-child policy, Female/Male ratio will further suffer. The Equal Right to be born is the first right of equality that needs to be restored to women without wasting any more time. It is already late.

 

In short, this law will further marginalize the already marginalized, will make the poor poorer and will further disempower the weakest sections of society. This is utterly inhuman and inherently dangerous for India’s future

 

Thursday, June 10, 2021

Tales of Antiquity by Javed Rashid

 


·

 

Ancient Tales
 
Tales of Antiquity
 

 

Patel : The ethos of the Hindu civilization is inclusive . The faith is flexible and readily absorbs other influences

 

Virat : In a  manner of speaking , inclusive yes , it did absorb the Dravidian theology , the Jian and Buddhist concepts , yoga and self improvement were accepted  , The Vedic Aryans , though , were  Brahamanic in nature  , many Sramanic practices were incorporated into Hinduism .

 

Patel :  Does that not prove my point , my thesis that Hinduism is inclusive in nature . The Vedic religion is in fact the continuation of the Indus Valley Religion and the Jain/Buddhist derivations.

 

Hamza : That cannot be true . The Vedas claimed to have destroyed the cities, burned them in fact. There is nothing common between the Soma drinking, sacrifice indulging, warrior people and the Yoga practicing Dravidians.

 

Jain : There is not even a single evidence prior to 3500 BC  of any Aryan presence in the Indus Cities , not even a single Vedic god , or language , or culture was a part of Harappan civilization . There is no continuity, no connection, and no compatibility.

 

Virat : The Vedic Brahmins were very clever , by accepting the Jain influences and gods, the Brahmins evoked the concepts of Dharam and Karam  . These concepts along with the caste stipulations enslaved an entire people. The very people that gave Hinduism mare than half its theology and gods were subjugated and relegated to be slaves. The beauty was that the slaves could not even protest the concept of Dharam and Karam does care of that.

 

Patel : The Bahrainis were  clever but they were flexible and accepted any practice of thought that had the potential to be popular . 

 

Jain : The Vedic Hindus destroyed and enslaved the Dravidians . Brahmins looted converted Dravid temples and fabricated stories to justify the loot and enslavement. Better looking Slave women were inducted into temples to serve the Brahmins, thereby adding insult to injury.

 

Virat : More recently , say about 1200 years ago thousand of Dravidians were mass murdered in South Asia , their temples were stolen and they were made slaved (Dalits, untouchables , devils) .

 

Patel:  This Aryan thesis is a myth, propagated by the usurping English man , there was no invasion , no destruction .

 

Jain : There has been no evidence of Vedic existence in the Indus Valley Civilization , the Vedic Hindus worshiped : Indra ; Agni (Fire) ; and Surya (Sun) .The Brahmins incorporated the Jain/Buddhist gods and religion and enslaved the entire Dravidian people .

 

Patel : Hindus are non violent . Gandhi Ji achieved independence using non violence as an instrument.

 

Virat : Vedic Hindus believed in animal sacrifice, even human sacrifice . They also believed in offerings to the gods to make them happy. They burnt the Indus cities and subsequently migrated to North India where they bitterly fought amongst themselves. Non violent indeed! Gandhi himself lost him life to the Hindus dagger.

 

Jain : the Vedic text speaks disparagingly of women , women were discouraged to read the holy text . Women were bracketed with Dalits .

 

Virat : The pacifist Hindus in fact drove the Buddhist form the Hindu heartland and all but eliminated the Jains , took over their temples , their concepts . That surely is not non violence.

 

Patel : This is all borrowed stuff there never was any invasion , these are stories concocted by foreigners .

 

Jain : The Shudras were deemed unfit  to recieve education . The upper Varnas were discouraged to impart education n or to give advice to a Shudra .It was deemed unnecessary that Shudra knows the law and codes. Hence there was no need to teach the Shudras the laws. Upper caste violators of this instruction were threatened punishment in the next life.

 

Virat : The Brahmin could  order a Shudra  to serve him without remunerations , because the Shudra was created to serve the upper classes  . The Shudra cannot be freed  off his slavery , only in the next rebirth there could be hope  or opportunity of a better status .

 

Patel :  There was harmony and there was inclusiveness . All castes were part of the same society , this was merely division of labor , sanctified by religion .

 

Jain : Shudras were to have no property  . The Brahmin had then right to the Shudras wealth. The Shudra’s wealth could be seized without compensation, since there is only one place for the Shudra in society.

 

Virat : Women were deemed fickle minded  . They were not to be trusted and friendship of women was said to be akin to that of friendship with a wolf. Women were called, ‘Dirika’, because she was considered the source of sorrow to all .They was deemed corrupt, greedy and un-vitreous. A wife, a son and a slave could have no wealth or property. The wealth they earn was considered acquired by labor to which the right was of the one they belong to.

Patel : The Hindu civilization reached great heights , All of this is untrue , tales spread by hate mongers .

 

Virat : Even Ram killed Shumbuka  simply because he was performing tapasia  (ascetic exercises ) , which he was not supposed  and allowed to do as he was of Shudra origin .

 

Jain : Dronachanga refused to teach  archery  to Elclavya because the later was not kshatriya by birth . A Shudra who has acquired wealth was considered to give pain to Brahama .

 

Patel : Hindus philosophy and theology merged to seek ways to include all people within society. This was a great achievement.

 

Virat : Hinduism borrowed elements from Buddhism and eventually the Hindus took up vegetarianism   and discouraged animal  sacrifices .Shankara developed a monoastic order on the Buddhist model  and also borrowed concepts  from Buddhist philosophy .He , is said to be the biggest opponent of Buddhism and was the principal architect of Buddhism downfall in India .

 

Hamza : Philosophy and theology was used to sanctify the wrongs done to a significant portion of the population  . This was done in such a clever manner that the enslaved were forced to acknowledge their slavery and were not allowed room for protest or even to seek revision.  Faith and fate were evoked to enslave an entire people; this was repeated in various forms with other threats.

 

Jain : When the Aryan invaders came to the Indus Valley they were vigorously opposed by tne Dravidians  . The Vedic Aryans refer to them as enemies and were called Dasyus. These were treated as outside society. Eventually they were drawn into society but in the process were enslaved; they paid heavy rice for this acceptance into Hindu society.

 

 

Patel : Hinduism is indeed inclusive, see the beauty of incorporation of the Jains and the Buddhists into main stream Hindu society and thought , all were hinduised . This proves my thesis.

 

 

Tales of less than Antiquity

 

Tara : The Mughals were cruel to the Sikhs .

 

Hamza : Well when Khusru revolted  against Jahangir  he got asylum at Guru Arjan s’ house , who was then constructing the Golden Temple .

 

Patel : All right but the Mughals behaved in a very uncivilized manner .

 

Hamza : The real story is that Chundu Lal  did not allow the Mughals and Sikhs to get together   . Sikh faith is more than half derived from Islam. Sikhs like Muslims are believers of equality. Muslims and Sikhs are very near in faith. They were never allowed to come nearer by the Hindu Brahmin.

 

Tara : Did the Muslim Emperors have no brains ? Was Jahangir oblivious to the intrigues of his Hindu couturiers? The Muslims themselves had respect for the Sikhs and Gurus. Why then this brutality, thus barbarity?

 

Hamza : Muslims were gullible . These, the emperors, were in any case ‘secular’ Muslims and were more interested in power than religion. Jahangir got swayed by the Hindu intrigue.

 

Patel : Why then murder the Guru Arjun .

 

Hamza : In Jahangir’s court was also the enemy of Guru Arjan Dev, Parthi .He poisoned the Emperors mind against the Guru  . Dewam Chabdu Lal wished that the Guru marry his only son Hargoband Ji to his daughter , this the Guru did not agree and thereby created a mortal enemy .

 

Hamza : Along with this the Guru gave asylum to the pretender Khusru . Jahangir himself was half Rajput, he succumbed to the intrigues of the Hindu courtiers.

 

Tara : Barbaric nevertheless .

 

Hmmza : The Muslim rulers were forbidden by faith  to avoid forcible conversions . They banned Riba yet allowed the Hindu Baniya to conduct his business based upon Riba .

 

Patel : Why then the brutal murder .

 

Hamza : The King , in any case, had only ordered the arrest of the Guru  , since the Guru had provided asylum to his rebellious brother  Khusru .

 

Tara : But it was still a major sin to execute the Guru Arjan Dev Ji .

 

Hamza : No the emperor was responding to his political instincts  . He was protecting his kingdom and punishing the helpers of the rebellious brother.

 

Patel : Punishment would have been acceptable but why the brutal killing .

 

Hamza : It was Chandu Lal who tortured and killed the Guru  . When the King came to know about this he handed over Chandu lal to the Sikhs who took befitting revenge and slew the intriguing courtier.

 

Patel : No I do not agree I think that the Muslims and Sikhs are mortal enemies  .

 

Hamza : It was Akbar who got impressed by the poetry of the Lahori Fourth Guru Ram Das . Akbar gave many villages to the Guru and also gave land in Amritsar where the Sikhs later constructed the Golden Temple. The Temples foundation was laid by Baba Mian Mir .When the Grant Sahaib was complied by Guru Arjun Dev the poetry of Baba Ghulam Farid was included in re holy book.

 

Tara : The Muslims did nothing byt create trouble for us Sikhs .

 

Hamza  It was the Mughals who converted the pacifist Sikhs into martial Singhs , The Fourth Guru slept on the floor and sold boiled eggs to make ends meet .Emperor Akbar gave one years tax to the Guru  and slowly the pacifist Sikhs got converted into militant Singhs .When Singhs became martial they forgot the Emperors largesse . They also forgot who laid the foundation of the Darbar Sahahb .

 

Tara : The Muslims were cruel to Sikhs .

 

Hamza : The half Rajput Emperor , got swayed by the Hindu intrigue and allowed the killing to take place , the seed of hatred this act sowed  culminated in half a million Muslims losing their lives at partition . Muslim women were raped, abducted and killed. The Muslims paid a very heavy price for the Emperors mistake. Master Tara Singh got entrapped by the Intriguing Hindus once more but Jinnah Shahib was much much wiser he understood his adversaries well . We bow our heads in gratitude to the sagacity of Jinnah Shahib .

 

Saturday, March 13, 2021

Uighurs: A people under Attack (JR234)

 






Uighurs: A people under Attack (JR234)

Introduction

The Uyghurs are recognized as native to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Northwest China. They are considered to be one of China's 55 officially recognized ethnic minorities. The Uyghurs are recognized by the Chinese government only as a regional minority within a multicultural nation. There are about 12 million Uighurs, mostly Muslim, living in north-western China in the region of Xinjiang, officially known as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR).

The Uighurs speak their own language, similar to Turkish, and see themselves as culturally and ethnically close to Central Asian nations.

They make up less than half of the Xinjiang population.

In recent decades, there's been a mass migration of Han Chinese (China's ethnic majority) to Xinjiang, and the Uighurs feel their culture and livelihoods are under threat.

Xinjiang lies in the north-west of China and is the country's biggest region. Like Tibet, it is autonomous, meaning - in theory - it has some powers of self-governance. But in practice, both face major restrictions by the central government. It is a mostly desert region, producing about a fifth of the world's cotton. It is also rich in oil and natural gas and because of its proximity to Central Asia and Europe is seen by Beijing as an important trade link. In the early 20th Century, the Uighurs briefly declared independence, but the region was brought under the complete control of mainland China's new Communist government in 1949.

Uighur  a Turkic-speaking people of interior Asia. Uighurs live for the most part in northwestern China, in the Uygur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang; a small number live in the Central Asian republics. There were some 10,000,000 Uighurs in China and at least a combined total of 300,000 in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan in the early 21st century.

 

The Uighurs are mainly a sedentary village-dwelling people who live in the network of oases formed in the valleys and lower slopes of the Tien Shan, Pamirs, and related mountain systems. The region is one of the most arid in the world; hence, for centuries they have practiced irrigation to conserve their water supply for agriculture. Their principal food crops are wheat, corn (maize), kaoliang (a form of sorghum), and melons. The chief industrial crop is cotton, which has long been grown in the area. Many Uighurs are employed in petroleum extraction, mining, and manufacturing in urban centers.

The chief Uighur cities are Ürümqi, the capital of Xinjiang, and Kashgar (Kashi), an ancient centre of trade on the historic Silk Road near the border between Russia and China. The Uighurs have lacked political unity in recent centuries, except for a brief period during the 19th century when they were in revolt against Beijing. Their social organization is centred on the village. The Uighurs of Xinjiang are Sunni Muslims

 

History

The Uighurs, Turkic nomads living north of the Gobi Desert, ruled over a powerful empire between 744 and 840. Its capital was Karabalghasun on the upper Orhon River in Mongolia. Although of nomadic origin, the Uighurs presided over flourishing commercial centers and agriculture. After their empire dissolved, a group of them who fled west created a new state centered in the oases north of the Taklamakan Desert and extending up into the mountains of the eastern Tien Shan. It would survive until nearly the end of the thirteenth century. The cosmopolitan culture and economic prosperity of these two Uighur states form a notable chapter in the history of the Silk Road.

The rapid rise of the Uighurs in the eighth century coincided with a period when the Tang dynasty in China was weakening. During the An Lu-shan rebellion against the Tang from 755-763, the Uighurs saved the dynasty and in return received rich payments of silk and other Chinese goods. The quantities of Chinese silk flowing into the northern steppes rivaled those that had been sent to the Xiongnu centuries earlier. The peak of Uighur power was under kaghan Mou-yü, who ascended the throne in 759.  His court and that of his successors was heavily influenced by Chinese culture, not the least of the reasons being the frequent marriages to Chinese princesses.

Mou-yü established Manichaeism as the state religion amongst the Uighurs. This dualist belief in the powers of good and evil and separation of matter from spirit had originated in Persia in the third century and was one of many foreign religious which made their way to China. The bearers of Manichaeism were the Sogdian merchants   from Central Asia, who became prominent in the Silk Road trade. Sogdians enjoyed some prominence at the Tang court, even though their religion was only just tolerated. Mou-yü's adoption of the Sogdians' faith in part reflects his desire to distance himself from the Tang and in part the reality of his heavy reliance on Sogdians for the creation of his state administration and for the trade on which Uighur prosperity depended. The Uighur scribal culture would later become the basis for writing Mongolian.

The Uighur language is part of the Turkic group of Altaic languages, and the Uighurs are among the oldest Turkic-speaking peoples of Central Asia. They are mentioned in Chinese records from the 3rd century CE. They first rose to prominence in the 8th century, when they established a kingdom along the Orhon River in what is now north-central Mongolia. In 840 this state was overrun by the Kyrgyz, however, and the Uighurs migrated southwestward to the area around the Tien (Tian) Shan (“Celestial Mountains”). There the Uighurs formed another independent kingdom in the Turfan Depression region, but this was overthrown by the expanding Mongols in the 13th century.

 

After the disintegration of this Uighur empire, some of its survivors created the kingdom of Kocho (Gaochang) (ca. 860-1284), whose urban centers were in the Turfan oasis north of the Taklamakan desert astride the northern branch of the Silk Road. This was a region that previously had been occupied by Indo-Europeans, whose language now was replaced by Turkic Uighur. The Uighurs of western Gansu and Xinjiang today are the descendants of the mixed ethnic population of the kingdom of Kocho.

The dominant religion in that region had long been Buddhism  Important Buddhist monasteries were located in and around the oases of Turfan. Their wall paintings providing striking evidence of the transmission and transformation of Buddhist art along the roads leading from India into China. Buddhism became the religion of the Uighur elite in the Kocho kingdom, although Manichaeism and Nestorian Christianity were prominent as well. The German archaeologists who excavated the Uighur ruins in the early twentieth century took back to Berlin some striking Manichean manuscript fragments and other evidence of what had once been a vibrant and truly cosmopolitan urban culture.

The penetration of Islam into the Tarim Basin (that is, the region around the Taklamakan Desert) was gradual. As early as 821 an Arab ambassador visited the Uighur capital at Karabalghasun. Islam spread east under the Karakhanids in the eleventh century (one of their capitals was Kashgar), but only much later would become the dominant religion of the Uighurs of Xinjiang in modern times.

Uighur nationalist historians in the People's Republic of China and the United States posit that the Uyghur people is millennia-old and can be divided into four distinct phases: Pre-Imperial (300 BC – AD 630), Imperial (AD 630–840), Idiqut (AD 840–1200), and Mongol (AD 1209–1600), with perhaps a fifth modern phase running from the death of the Silk Road in AD 1600 until the present. In brief, Uyghur history is the story of a small nomadic tribe from the Altai Mountains competing with rival powers in Central Asia, including other Altaic tribes, Indo-European empires from the south and west and Sino-Tibetan empires to the east. After the collapse of the Uyghur Khaganate in AD 840, ancient Uyghur resettled from Mongolia to the Tarim Basin, assimilating the Indo-European population, which had previously been driven out of the region by the Xiongnu. Ultimately, the Uyghurs became civil servants administering the Mongol Empire.

 

Chinese treatment of the Uighurs

China is facing mounting criticism from around the world over its treatment of the mostly Muslim Uighur population in the north-western region of Xinjiang. Rights groups believe China has detained more than a million Uighurs over the past few years in what the state defines as "re-education camps".There is evidence of Uighurs being used as forced labour and of women being forcibly sterilised.

The US has accused China of committing genocide and crimes against humanity through its repression of the Uighurs.

Large numbers of Han (ethnic Chinese) began moving into Xinjiang after the establishment of the autonomous region in the 1950s. The influx became especially pronounced after 1990, and by the late 20th century the Han constituted two-fifths of Xinjiang’s total population. Over time economic disparities and ethnic tensions grew between the Uighur and Han populations that eventually resulted in protests and other disturbances. A particularly violent outbreak occurred in July 2009, mainly in Ürümqi, in which it was reported that nearly 200 people (mostly Han) were killed and some 1,700 were injured. Violent incidents increased after that and included attacks by knife-wielding assailants and by suicide bombers. Chinese authorities responded by cracking down on Uighurs suspected of being dissidents and separatists. The authorities’ actions included shootings, arrests, and long jail sentences until 2017, when the Chinese government initiated a thorough crackdown on Uighurs in Xinjiang. Citing a need for greater security, the government set up cameras, checkpoints, and constant police patrols in Uighur-dominated areas. The most controversial governmental undertaking—which was met by protests from human-rights organizations—was the indefinite detention of up to one million Uighurs in “political training centres,” heavily fortified buildings that were likened to the reeducation camps of the Mao Zedong era. In August 2018 the United Nations called upon China to end the detention, but government officials denied the existence of the camps

 

The US has accused China of committing genocide against the Uighurs. According to international convention, genocide is the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group".

It follows reports that, as well as interning Uighurs in camps, China has been forcibly mass sterilising Uighur women to suppress the population and separating Uighur children from their families.

On his final day in office under the Trump administration, US Secretary of state Mike Pompeo said: "I believe this genocide is ongoing, and that we are witnessing the systematic attempt to destroy Uighurs by the Chinese party-state."

A UN human rights committee in 2018 said it had credible reports the Chinese were holding up to a million people in "counter-extremism centres" in Xinjiang.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute found evidence in 2020 of more than 380 of these "re-education camps" in Xinjiang, an increase of 40% on previous estimates media caption In 2018, the BBC found all reporting was tightly controlled

Earlier, leaked documents known as the China Cables made clear that the camps were intended to be run as high security prisons, with strict discipline and punishments.

People who have managed to escape the camps have reported physical, mental and sexual torture - women have spoken of mass rape and sexual abuse.

In December 2020 research seen by the BBC showed up to half a million people were being forced to pick cotton. There is evidence new factories have been built within the grounds of the re-education camps.

 

Anti-Han and separatist sentiment rose in Xinjiang from the 1990s, flaring into violence on occasion. In 2009 some 200 people died in clashes in Xinjiang, which the Chinese blamed on Uighurs who want their own state. But in recent years a massive security crackdown has crushed dissent.

Xinjiang is now covered by a pervasive network of surveillance, including police, checkpoints, and cameras that scan everything from number plates to individual faces. According to Human Rights Watch, police are also using a mobile app to monitor peoples' behaviour, such as how much electricity they are using and how often they use their front door.

Since 2017 when President Xi Jinping issued an order saying all religions in China should be Chinese in orientation, there have been further crackdowns. Campaigners say China is trying to eradicate Uighur culture.

 China says the allegations are  are completely untrue.It says the crackdown is necessary to prevent terrorism and root out Islamist extremism and the camps are an effective tool for re-educating inmates in its fight against terrorism. It insists that Uighur militants are waging a violent campaign for an independent state by plotting bombings, sabotage and civic unrest, but it is accused of exaggerating the threat in order to justify repression of the Uighurs.

China has dismissed claims it is trying to reduce the Uighur population through mass sterilisations as "baseless", and says allegations of forced labour are "completely fabricated

Muslim in China

  Islam was once highly regarded by Chinese emperors. From written records and imperial edicts engraved on steles (standing stone slabs monuments) it is clear that these Islamic communities enjoyed the favor of the emperors—especially during the Tang (618-907 AD), Yuan (1271-1368), Ming (1368-1644) and Qing (1644-1912) dynasties. Islam was looked on favorably by the imperial court because of its ethics, which—as far as the emperors were concerned—promoted harmonious and peaceful relations between the diverse peoples in the imperial territories.

Today, Suzhou is a vibrant, wealthy city of 12 million people only 20 minutes by high speed train from Shanghai. What remains of “Islamic Suzhou” lies just outside the city wall to the north-west. There is only one active mosque: Taipingfang, in the northern commercial and entertainment district of Shilu.

Taipingfang was restored in 2018 and is where local and visiting Muslims go to pray. It’s in a busy part of the neighborhood, squeezed in a tiny alley, surrounded by small restaurants and hotels, canteens, food stalls, and butchers catering to Uighur and Hui Muslims. The butchers of Taipingfang—like those in Beijing’s Niujie area where the majority of the city’s Muslim minority lives—are popularly thought to sell the best meat.

Before 1949, Suzhou had at least 10 mosques of various sizes and social importance. Many of them were vast buildings with precious furniture and sophisticated decorations, while others were smaller intimate prayer rooms. One of them was a women’s mosque presided over by a female imam.

The women’s mosque, Baolinqian, was one of a cluster of four mosques was built during the Qing Dynasty, all connected to the wealthy Yang family inside the city walls in the north-western part of the city. Built in 1923, it was established by initiative of three married women from the Yang family who donated the building and raised funding from other Muslim families to turn it into a women’s mosque. During the Cultural Revolution (1966 to 1976), the mosque’s library, containing holy scriptures, was damaged and the building was turned into private houses. Nothing remains today to show it was a mosque.

Another Yang family mosque, Tiejunong, was built over three years during the reign of the Qing emperor Guagxu, from 1879 to 1881. It was the biggest in Suzhou with an area of more than 3,000 square meters, featuring seven courtyards. The main hall for Friday prayers had 10 rooms and could hold more than 300 people. The courtyard included a minaret and a pavilion in which was housed an imperial stele.

Now a middle school, Tiejunong is recognizable from the external architecture and an ancient wooden engraved side door. Beyond a monumental entrance, there is still the idea of the main courtyard surrounded by trees. Now there is a huge football field, and the trees on the sides of the walkway are still visible from their chopped trunks. The ablution area covered by blue tiles clearly shows the past presence of a mosque.

Tiankuqian Mosque was built in 1906 and is now inhabited by poor city residents—most likely as a result of the practice during the Cultural Revolution of reallocating large, aristocratic or religious buildings as living accommodation for indigent families. The mosque used to cover an area of almost 2,000 square meters, with a main hall, a guest hall, and ablution room.

The structure of the main hall was like a large lecture place, containing—as the local historical records report—a ginkgo wood horizontal plaque written in calligraphy by master Yu Yue. Because many Muslim jade workers had businesses in the same district, donations made the mosque the most prosperous in the whole of China. And, in the 1920s, a school teaching Islamic and Confucian texts was opened there.

Many of the mosques had affiliated schools teaching the Arabic language and Islamic writings to the children of the Muslim communities. Suzhou is one of the first cultural centers where Islamic scriptures were published in the Chinese language. Translations from Persian into Chinese were made by the 16th-century Suzhou scholars, Zhang Zhong and Zhou Shiqi, making the city an early hub of Islamic intellectual culture.

But it was an Islamic hub hybridized in its Chinese context, a process described in Jonathan Lipman’s book, Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. Islamic texts were taught alongside Confucian ones, giving birth to an eclectic corpus of Islamic writings.

The oldest Suzhou mosque, Xiguan, takes its name from the adjacent Xiguan bridge in the center of the old city. It was built in the 13th century during the Yuan dynasty, probably financed by the prominent Muslim Sayyid family, and its influential Yunnan’s provincial governor, Sayyid Ajall Shams al-Din Omar al-Bukhari (1211-1279).

The mosque was later incorporated into a government building during the Ming dynasty, so only written accounts remain of its existence in local Chinese records. This suggests—and it is already a well-known historical assessment—that the Yuan dynasty favored Muslims from Central Asia in its administration and government service. This significant population group was much later, in the 1950s, classified within China as the Hui minority and constitute about half of China’s Muslims today.

Traces of the past

The Cultural Revolution effectively banned Islam in China, as religions of any kind were considered tools to oppress and silence the peoples’ needs. As a result, little remains of these religious buildings today. But the traces that do still exist—a door, a stone, the structure of the façade, or simply a known address, written in an archive—are symbolic representations of a past life. These are clues to the diverse social context and spiritual geography that these places inspired and were part of.

As the American sinologist, Frederick Mote—a professor of history at Princeton University—argued, Suzhou’s past is embodied in words, not stones, and the fragments of Suzhou Islamic communities can be pieced together with the help of historical written records. These records of a diverse past are equally important to the future in a country where religions—every religion—are strictly controlled by the state due to what the authorities consider as their potential destabilizing political powers.

The recent reports of efforts of ideological re-education performed by local authorities towards the Uighur population in north-western China make the situation even more complex and worth further observation and research.