Monday, March 11, 2019

Surgical and Medical Instruments Industry of Pakistan (JR 145)









Surgical and Medical Instruments Industry of Pakistan (JR 145)
How the industry developed
Scottish surgeon broke his instrument in 1905, this was repaired by a lohar from Kotli Loharan, near Sialkot, The lohar was commissioned to repair and manufacture these instruments. The industry started and slowly shifted to Sialkot. Surgical industry of Pakistan dates, back to 19th century when some British doctors got their surgical instruments repaired from the skilled workers of Sialkot and thus it laid foundation to the Sialkot Surgical Industry. In 1930 the first export of surgical instruments was made to the UK. Since then the industry has expanded but has existed only as a cottage industry. In the 60s some modern techniques like: drop forging; sand blasting; electrolytic polishing; heat treatment etc. were introduced, these were readily adopted by the local industry. Presently the industry has progressed as a well mechanized sub sector in Pakistan, concentrated in the industrial city of Sialkot.
Raw Materials
Stainless steel and steel forgings both imported as well as local are major industrial inputs. The other material required is processed chemicals. The manufacturers have concerns about the quality of the local steel as it reportedly doesn’t conform to health grade steel. Steel is mainly imported from Japan, France, Germany & Taiwan. Due to volatile prices of imported raw material the Sialkot based firms find it difficult to do long term forecasting. There is a shortage of good quality Titanium because Titanium import is ban. Therefore the Titanium is being taken from ship breaking which caused air bubbles in the material.

Current Status
The surgical instrument industry performed brilliantly, but this was not due to any government assistance, they had no access to bank sector funds and were able to survive and grow on their own. Germen and Dutch help was made available though, but this resulted in reverse technology transfer as the technology was passed on to surgical manufacturing industry in Ludhiana in East Punjab India.
Surgical instrument industry is one of remarkable trade source working in our multi products manufacturing city Sialkot which is famous for exporting the surgical instrument. These instruments are exported around the globe and 250million US dollar worth surgical instrument are exported to various international markets which is big show of trade source of Pakistan.
More than 3000 firms are associated with this business and more than five hundred thousand employees are working in manufacturing of surgical instruments industries to meet the export orders as well as local demands. In Sialkot over ten thousand different medical instrument covering all the sections of surgery and basics are being manufactured, this type of assortment of instruments is not available anywhere else in the world. The surgical Industry represents manufacturers and exporters of surgical Instruments: Electro medical instruments; Body external fixation system; Implants micro surgery instruments; Cardio vascular instruments; Endoscopic and gynecological instrument; ENT instruments respirators aid instrument; Personal beauty care items; Orthopedic instruments; Anesthesia products; Hospital furniture and dental instruments etc.
The Internationally reputed companies of surgical Instruments are building joint venture with Pakistani companies reflecting the confidence of multi nationals in the abilities of Pakistan surgical manufacturer. According to SIMAP (surgical instrument manufacturer association of Pakistan) the competitive edge of the sector is: competitive prices; Shortest delivery time; Varieties of thousands of surgical instruments are available; and Industry has its own material testing laboratory
They also said that the current world market of medical products is estimated at US $ 30 billion and it is growing gradually, keeping in view the constant developments and innovations in this sector a major share of such huge market can be captured. 
In Sialkot over 10,000 different medical instruments, covering all basic and surgical segments, are being manufactured. Over 99pc of production is centered at Sialkot. The sector comprises of around 3,000 companies with the labor force ranging from (15-450) per unit, of which around 30 can be considered large units, and 150 as medium sized enterprises.
The industry produces on average over 170m pieces a year. Of the total production, over 95pc is exported, which includes 60pc of disposable and 40pc of reusable surgical instruments. A wide range of industries including steel, chemicals, and machine parts also have strong linkages with the surgical segment.
The sector comprises of around 3,000 companies with production over 10,000 various medical instruments having the labour force ranging from (15-450) per unit, of which around 30 can be considered large units, and 150 as medium sized enterprises. The industry produces on average over 170 million pieces a year. Of the total production, over 95 percent is exported, which includes 60 percent of disposable and 40 percent of reusable surgical instruments.
Availability or raw material is an essential element for any manufacturing industry. In case of Pakistan surgical industry, besides having large number of process sub-contractors also includes the suppliers, importers and traders of inputs such as stainless steel, chemicals and other raw materials. The presence of such input suppliers guarantee the availability of raw materials therefore saving a lot of hassle for the manufacturers, which in absence of such suppliers have to import raw materials individually. This not only provides inputs at lower costs due to competition but also saves transportation and pre-operating costs
    The production of the industry can be broadly classified into two categories, i.e. disposable instruments and the reusable instruments (or instruments). The largest market for Pakistani disposable instruments is USA. Majority of the reusable instruments, manufactured in Sialkot, are exported to the European countries. Industry at a glance: 

Total number of units
Approx. 2400

Installed Capacity
200 Million
Pieces/annum

Total Capital
Investment
Rs. 12.0 billion

No. of worker
100,000-150,000

No. of people
involved (Direct/indirect)
350,000-450,000
Export
US $ 156 Million

World market of
surgical instrument
US $ 30 billion

Production
100 million Nos.

Source of Machinery
Germany, UK, USA, China



Exports
Surgical goods and medical instruments worth US$ 221.298 million were exported from the country in first seven months of the financial year (2018) as compared the corresponding period of previous year. During the period from July-January, 2017-18, the exports of medical goods and surgical instruments grew by 15.27 percent as above mentioned commodities worth $221.298 million exported as compared the exports of $191.979 million of the same period last year. Meanwhile, cutlery goods valuing $52.200 million exported in last seven months as compared the exports of $46.224 million, showing an increase of 12.93 percent during the period under review, said data of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS).
Year
Value (US$)
 2015-2016
358.00
2014-2015
339.00
2013-2014
335.00
2012-2013
303.00
2011-2012
297.00
2010-2011
259.00

This is a sector where Pakistan enjoys specialized skills. Products are exported into high income markets of USA, Germany & France. Total world market is estimated at 30 billion USD. During 2010-2011 Pakistan exported Surgical & Medical instruments worth USD 260.60 million. This shows an increase of 13.7% over 2009-2010 export figures of 229.20 million.
The world trade in medical and surgical industry is huge which goes up to 30 billion dollar. Although Pakistan fetches a very small share in the world trade, still the local industry possesses specialized skills and workers expertise which carry a century old experience in producing these sophisticated items. Pakistani products are sold in highly developed market of Germany, France, USA, Belgium etc which are also bracketed as high income markets.

The average export price of Sialkot made surgical items is between dollar 1.5 to 2.5 USD per item (for disposable products) which is higher than the Chinese export price of USD 0.35 per item. Pakistan has no competitor in Opthalmic handheld instruments.

Range of Production
The surgical equipment, optical and photographic equipment is described under HS Code 90 and includes.
Ø    Irrigation and injection needles, tips and tubs, for introducing fluid
Ø    Tyndale's, to help wedge” open damaged issues in the brain
Ø    Powered devices, such as drills, dermatomes
Ø    Scopes and probes, including fiber optic endoscopes and tactile probes
Ø    Carriers and appliers for optical, electronic and mechanical devices
Ø    Ultrasound tissue disruptors, cryotomes and cutting laser guides
Ø    Measurement devices, such as rulers and clippers
Ø     

The city of Sialkot is very well known particularly in Europe for its surgical industry. There are around 2300 companies engaged in this industry which produce on average 150 million pieces per year with an estimated value of around Rs. 22 billion. Almost 95% production is export oriented.

Pakistan basically produces basic disposable instruments. The growth in this industry segment is low. As compared there is demand of devises and apparatus components using computer aided electronics which are fetching higher per unit prices.

Therefore the shift of emphasis in the global leading manufacturers is on high value added products. Practically Sialkot has no competitor on basic component and most of the production from Germany has shifted to Pakistan. The result is that Pakistan produces semi-finished goods which are repackaged in Germany, Europe & USA and then sold internationally at higher prices. The very low quantity is consumed locally due to low demand by public health entities and private sector hospitals. In fact, this Sialkot based industry has limited contacts with the local end users, they normally operate through bulk buyers/traders.

Out of 2300 major companies 30 units are large integrated units. These bigger companies are technically advanced with lot of mechanization in their production processes. They have also diversified products into medical mechanized devices. Second category is of medium type of firms which are around 150 in numbers and they handle exports of above 100 million. The small units are 2000 in numbers and they handle export of up to 80 million.

The details of surgical instrument which are being exported is as under
ü  Instruments and appliances used in medical or veterinary sciences
ü  Instruments and appliances, used in dental sciences
ü  Needles, catheters, cannulae
ü  Syringes, with or without needles
ü  Oxygen therapy, artificial respiration/ therapeutic respiration
ü  Dentists, barbers or similar chairs and parts thereof
ü  Medical, surgical, dental or veterinary furniture and parts
ü  Dental drill engines,  
ü  Ophthalmic drill engines, and appliances
ü  Breathe appliances & gas masks, protective masks
3           Tubular metal needles and needles for sutures
4           Mechano-therapy application; massage app; psychological aptitude test apparatus
ü   
Labor Conditions in the Surgical Instrument Manufacture Sector
The initial manufacture of surgical instruments involves die making, forging, filing, grinding, machining, electroplating, and heat treatment. Most of these processes are subcontracted to countless small process specific workshops, with the final finishing (chemical cleaning and polishing) and quality checking by the final producers. The use of subcontractors became common in the mid-1970s after a period of labor unrest and strikes. Subcontracting minimizes company overheads and lowers costs, but, because subcontractors are not employees of the company and competition is aggressive, it drives down wages and health and safety standards. Subcontracted manual laborers are paid per instrument, and the average worker earns around
$2 a day (personal communication). They have no job security or guarantee of income and no medical insurance or provision of education for their children. Nearly all subcontractors are forced to seek wages in advance from the firms that employ them, further disadvantaging these workers' position in arguing for a fair wage.
Manufacturing Standards:
Surgical industry is the sector where quality is major issue of concern. Recently its importance has  increased  manifolds  given  the  increasing global  competition  and  new  regulations  being enforced by the developed countries. These regulations require the exporters of the developing   countries   to   introduce   systems focusing on the improvement of management, labor, technology, and all the other fields which in any way affect the firm.
The surgical instrument standards must be in conformance with WTO standards.  Over 300 Companies have ISO-9002 Certification and about 250 have Certification of Good Manufacturing Practices5. Sialkot Material Testing Laboratory (SIMTEL) A UNIDO assisted material testing laboratory has been   set   up   in   Sialkot   in   the   year   2000 comprising of three laboratories:
Spectro Lab
Metallographic Lab
Chemical Testing Lab
Manufacture and Supply in Sialkot:
Manufacturers of surgical instruments in Sialkot need to minimize costs to remain competitive. To reduce overheads, most firms subcontract the initial production of instruments to workers employed in a small workshop or their own home, with finishing and quality checking of the product in house before export, quality is checked against European Union or US standards. Manufacturing firms in Pakistan, however, rarely have the infrastructure or marketing presence to allow direct trade with the end users in the destination countries. Most therefore sell to suppliers and retailers in the developed world with only a small profit margin. These “middle men” (mostly in Tuttlingen) then trade with end users, predominantly in the US or Western Europe, usually after a considerable mark up. For example, a pair of fine surgical scissors will cost
$1.00 to produce, will be exported from Pakistan to Germany at a price of $1.25 (personal communication), and will probably be sold to a hospital for nearer $80.00. In 1999, instruments costing a total of $27.5 million were exported in this way from Sialkot.



Problems Faced by the Industry
Pakistan is the leading exporter of surgical instruments, but local manufacturers receive only 2pc, or $359m, of the $17bn global trade, as most of it is lost to outsourcing importers. This is due to the inability of the industry to develop international brands. Basically, local producers are suppliers to international brands based in the US and Western Europe, who outsource manufacturing to artisans concentrated in Sialkot. Some international brands are reported to have shut down manufacturing facilities in their home countries as they get the best products from Pakistan’s world class artisans. Internationally, social movement of fair trade is initiated to help producers in developing countries get a fair value for products such as coffee, sugar, fruit juices etc. Why can’t a fair trade demand be raised for surgical instruments? Some international brands are reported to have shut down manufacturing facilities in their home countries as they get the best products from Pakistani world class artisans

Top 10 buyers are the US, Germany, the UK, France, Italy, UAE, Japan, Brazil, Mexico, and Russia. America is the largest market for disposable instruments, while a majority of reusable instruments are exported to the EU. Former . Pakistan is working as a vendor for other exporting countries. He said these countries sourced products to Sialkot and then stamped their logo on them for export to the world market. We can’t even directly export to Islamic countries because of the excessive registration procedure. , as also the same products are landing in their markets from Germany and US under international brand names .The ministry of commerce is a silent spectator to this whole set of affairs of unfair trade practices.  Ironically, the ministry of commerce has failed to help the sector in developing brands. In the previous trade policy, the government allocated funds for brand acquisition rather than development. Sialkot caters to 90pc of the global demand. The government has also failed to secure direct market access for these products under its so-called preferential trade agreements. Some industrialists say Germany has closed down its own industries and is now outsourcing manufacturing to Sialkot.
New mediators are also emerging. Pakistan’s direct exports of surgical instruments to China and India are also on the rise. According to a study of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Pakistan’s exports of surgical products rose to $9.6m in 2014 from $7.6m a year earlier. The study indicates a huge potential exists for increasing direct exports of surgical instruments.
The goods outsourced for manufacturing in Sialkot by German and UAE based companies find their way into Indian markets. The US is the larger exporter of surgical instruments to India. Germany, China and Japan come after. There is a wide margin in import value of these products from Pakistan for re-export to India.
The surgical sector, according to industrialists, is facing several problems. These range from marketing to adoption of new technology. Marketing is a basic problem owing to a failure to develop local brands. Energy supply is another major handicap.
Neither industrialists nor the government allocates funds for R&D to innovate new products in order to stay updated with changing patterns in medical sciences. There is no training institute to train human resource. As 95pc of the surgical industry operates in the SME sector, there is a need for a common facility centre to reduce the cost of production.
Sialkot’s position as a leading exporter of surgical instruments may also come under threat from upcoming competition from China and Mexico. These countries not only have cheap labor, but also use superior technologically for innovation and better materials for manufacturing.
The surgical sector, one of the five prime export-oriented sectors of the country has been facing multiple problems. The leakage of production technology, rise in production cost of surgical instruments and the export of steel scrap are causing havoc for the metal-related industries as scrap is the major source of locally produced stainless steel, which fulfils approximately 45 percent of the requirement. Representatives of Surgical Instrument Manufacturers Association of Pakistan (SIMAP) were of the view export of surgical forgings and semi and unfinished products were the most critical components for decline in surgical instruments exports.“If these products will be exported to other countries, then local industry will suffer heavily in shape of loss of export orders”.
The government should check the export of scrap from the country. Surgical Instrument Manufacturers Association of Pakistan urged Commerce Ministry and Federal Board of Revenue to immediately impose a ban on export of forgings, semi-finished and unfinished products.“Both India and China, only repack or stamp Pakistan-made instruments and sell them as their own brands.” Lack of brand development is another major issue concerning this industry. Brand development is such an exercise, which cannot be done by a company due to the fact it requires huge resources and expertise and support of the government. India and China, which actually have no manufacturing or technical skills in this field, are rapidly penetrating in surgical business, only by doing branding with full support and assistance from their respective governments. If India could earn huge foreign exchange by brand promotion only, then why can’t we when we produce world-class medical instruments.
Surgical industry could start earning at least $1 billion within three years, provided, it is given due attention by the concerned government departments. The rising utilities costs, increasing prices of raw materials, high banking service charges, high export refinance rates of central bank and uneven taxation system are added barriers to the falling exports.“We are the largest suppliers of medical instruments to United States of America (25 percent) of total export, Germany (20 percent), United Kingdom (10 percent), Italy (5.0 percent) and United Arab Emirates (5.0 percent).In India, where due to realistic and practical policies prepared in consultation with the business community the exports are touching over $140 billion mark. Trade organisations are not consulted during the preparation of policies and neither are their recommendations included in the policies.
Exporters of Pakistan share merely over 2 percent ($450 million), of the $21 billion global trade, as most of it is lost to outsourcing importers. Basically, local producers are suppliers to international brands based in the United States and Western Europe, who outsource manufacturing to artisans concentrated in Sialkot.
United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, United Arab Emirates, Japan, Russia, Mexico and Brazil are main exports destinations. America is the largest market for disposable instruments, while a majority of reusable instruments are exported to European Union. The Ministry of Commerce has failed to help the sector in developing brands.
Pakistan’s direct exports of surgical instruments to China and India are also on satisfactory level. Pakistan’s exports of surgical products remained to $9 million in 2016.The surgical sector has been facing bottleneck in marketing to adoption of new technology. There is no training institute to train human resource. 95 percent surgical industry operates in small and medium enterprises sector. There is a need to increase common facility centers to reduce the cost of production.
Surgical industry is technology based, but in Pakistan this industry has flourished without sophisticated technology.  There is a lack of qualified and trained engineers in factories. The process supervision and operations management is done by non-technical personnel. The process of new product development is done by using reverse engineering, without following proper procedures such as preparing technical drawings. At this stage of development, to grow further the industry needs technical assistance in process improvement, operations management and also for new product development. Latest developments in the industry are threat to the industry as well as an excellent opportunity at the same time. It all depends on the availability or resources. The Pakistani surgical instrument industry, in order to develop on sustainable basis needs to have a strong research and development base which facilitates the introduction of new materials and latest processing techniques
In today’s dynamic world technology plays vital role in the development of any field. Keeping in view   the   surgical   industry   of   Pakistan,   in beginning   the   instruments   manufactured   in Pakistani surgical industry was handmade; but with the passage of time, the industry adopted to change but this change is so gradual that we are still lagging behind in the field of technology. These days’ new technologies are taking place of the old ones, for example:
− CNC Machines (Computer Numeric Control)
− MIS (Medical Invasive Surgery) Instruments These technologies are adopted by Germany but not here in Sialkot yet. Its reasons are:
− Unawareness of industrialists about these technologies
− These are very expensive and our people are unable to adopt these technologies
− There are no trained people to work according to these technologies.


One of the basic elements for the growth of any business is marketing. Unfortunately, Pakistani surgical industry is far behind in this field. There is no strategy to deal with the local market. Major portion   of   the   production   is   sold   to   the international wholesalers and distributors, who sell these products under their own brand name. When we talk about the exports, there is bad luck for the cluster that it has a deep history but it has no own “Brand” developed yet. We are working as  vendors  for  the  other  exporting  countries. However, some entrepreneurs are aware of this problem and they are trying to develop their own brand.
Research & Development Constraint: Research & Development is the need of today’s business   for   its   survival.   Non-adoption   of research and development by manufacturers and exporters is also a major problem of surgical industry of Pakistan. No attention is given on development          and      betterment     of         medical instruments.   There   is   an   urgent   need   that businesses establish research and development cells in their premises and allocate a certain percentage of their profits precisely on research and development.   
Organizations are made up of people, who are the building block of that organization.  But the human resources of our surgical industry are not properly managed because people are not well aware of the resource management. The entrepreneurs themselves execute every function of HR. They consider placement of a professional or business graduate as a waste of money; moreover, the professionals are misconceived as another exploitation tool that might steal their business secrets. There is an emergent need of a surgical training institute/centre, where current labor force could be     trained     for     enhancement     of     their manufacturing skills and new entrants could also be trained in this institute.
Financial Constraint:
Finance is another issue of the cluster, especially for small enterprises. There is large number of financial institutions and leasing companies present in Sialkot which are providing financial services. Majority of the manufacturers consist of vendors, who have small setup. Most of them have no reach to the banks. They are unaware of how to avail the loan facility. However, large firms have good relation with the financial institutes and leasing companies.
Recommendations:
Out of the total production surgical instruments in Sialkot, approximately over 95% is exported, approximately 100 million instruments annually. It shows the importance of our surgical goods, it has  the  grand  contribution  in  our  export  and  foreign exchange earnings. But still it has been a big scope for more contribution and development in this field;
The burning issue of this industry is “skilled labor” availability and this problem can be resolved by the mutual efforts of government and businessmen by providing technical courses, on job training courses and machinery handling courses etc. related to this field because there is a threat of losing the skilled labor due to no proper transfer of skills to the next generation.   
Sialkot is the hub of surgical industry so govt. must establish the new training and vocational centers under TEVTA and other boards in Sialkot and its nearby areas e.g. Narowal, Pasroor etc. to attracting the labor and new comers in the field and provide them the up to date knowledge to enhance their skills. And recognize the importance of the degrees of TEVTA and other such institutions to realize the labor their worth. With such efforts, deficiency of skilled labor can be controlled in coming years.
In surgical field, the production procedure comprises of series of processes, and it involves the use of latest and expensive technology therefore the need is to establish “Common Facility Center” in Sialkot to facilitate the export of surgical items. Govt. should realize this need and start a project of “Common Facility Center” with the help of businessmen. It will reduce the cost of production, enhance profit margins and prove fruitful for boosting export.
In surgical field, there is a crucial need for developing “R & D Department” to work for the betterment of the production process as well as for the product development. On the other hand, R&D departments must establish to explore new markets for boosting the export of our surgical instruments because our major customers are USA & Europe but still there is a large scope for us e.g. Iran and Japan is the potential market but our share of export in these markets are only 0.1%.
With the vital need of “Human Resource” in surgical industry, there is also a crucial need of “Financial Resources”. In Sialkot, most businesses are related to cottage industry so, finance is the basic need but SME’s faces a lot of problems and issues at the time of getting finance (loans) from financial institutions.  
For promoting our global business of surgical  items,  we  must  have  complete awareness about quality standards e.g. ISO and CGMPs etc. and must try to implement them fully to  build  up  the  trust  on  our foreign customers to sustain in such a competitive world.
In surgical industry, businessmen must focus on new methodologies of production and must try to adopt the latest technology (e.g. CNC machines and MIS etc.) in different sections of manufacturing process. They can do this by maintaining the reserves for this purpose from their profits.
Despite the fact that we produce an immense quantity of surgical items but still we are far behind in case of “Marketing” of our products to increase the trade round the globe. There is lack of presentation in our products in every aspect. Especially, in trade fairs and exhibitions, TDAP must facilitate our Pakistani traders to present their products in attractive way to retain the customers.
Exporters   of   Sialkot   are   the   foreign exchange earner for the country, so the concerned authorities must take steps to communicate with government to reduce the anxiety of the traders related to tax issue In Sialkot surgical industry , SME’s have lack of proper management hierarchy. In such firms, there must be some proper advisory and supervisory authorities to handle the different production departments. In this way, there is more chance of efficiency in all departments.
Infrastructure Development: Transportation is the backbone of export and industrial sector as a heavy portion of the product cost of an exporters include the transportation expenses and cargo charges. This issue must be resolved through; Roads linked with rural areas and main cities must be properly constructed for better   approach   and   smoothing   the internal trade directly and export indirectly.
Check & balance of dry port and airport fair system for controlling the cost and improving the quality of products. Government must invest heavily in the improvement of physical and financial structure including shipment, clearance, cargo system, handling at the ports and airports for smooth flow of export.
To acquire affordable and quality technical assistance at home, an excellent engineering university should be established in Sialkot to give boost to the trade.
Today, China and other competitive countries are entertaining with long term trade deals at reasonably low rates to sustain their customer for long-run. But Pakistani exporters fails to adopt such strategies because of constant fluctuation in prices of oil, gas, electricity, material’s cost etc. Therefore our exporters could not reach out to their real potential. In this regard Govt. and other trade related bodies must perform their role by framing some long term projects on the extraction and usage of natural resources as well as electricity plants.
Surgical   instruments   can   be   generally divided into six classes by function. These classes are:
Cutting instruments
Grasping or holding instruments
Haemostatic forceps (instruments used to stop blood flow)
Retractors
Clamps and distractors
Accessories and implants

So, there is a need of product diversification in the international market time to time in order to capture the new foreign markets. We cannot ignore that our 80% surgical export is depending on single-use products. But we should focus on the pricing of them collectively to make the strength of our products in international market. There is need to reconsider our pricing strategies of re-useable products and single-use products.
The leading manufacturers and exporters of surgical items should be encouraged to develop their own brands and labels for their products. The highest level of value addition occurs when products are sold under a brand name. Sialkot is the major export oriented city in Pakistan. Sialkot based export goods are highly appreciated in International markets. It’s high time for Pakistan to use the opportunities available at international level. Govt. should encourage and support the leading manufacturers and exporters of surgical instruments to develop their own brands and labels for their products. Such steps will ultimately flourish our trade.
Conclusion:
Pakistan has great potential to exploit the international market of surgical instruments as it has great workforce, talent, skills, resources, strengths and opportunities to make the way to success. Moreover, there is large scope of success in this market. But, need of the time is for government and large players to support this industry .


Friday, March 8, 2019

India Accelerated Atrocities and Oppressive Tactics in Kashmir by Sajjad Shaukat (JR 144 SS 31)












India Accelerated Atrocities and Oppressive Tactics in Kashmir by Sajjad Shaukat (JR 144 SS 31)

There is a co-relationship of Indian oppressive tactics in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) and war-like posture against Pakistan, as the extremist government of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led the Indian fundamentalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi who has directed the Indian security forces to accelerate atrocities in the IOK, want to obtain various sinister designs, especially to suppress the Kashmiris’ war of liberation and to win the general elections 2019 at the cost of Pakistan.  

Following the false flag Pulwama terror attack in the IOK, which killed 44 Indian soldiers on February 14, this year, Indian Air Force (IAF) conducted pre-emptive air strike near the town of Balakot, close to the border with Pakistan’s sector of Kashmir on February 27, 2018, while claiming that IAF fighters targeted the camp of Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and killed 350 militants—the outfit whom New Delhi blamed for the Pulwama attack. Next day, in response, Pakistan Air Force (PAF) launched aerial strikes at six targets in the IOK and shot down two Indian fighter jets and captured Indian pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman who was released as a gesture of peace and handed over to the Indian authorities.

Without any investigation and evidence Indian high officials and media started accusing Islamabad, saying that the attackers had come from Pakistan to stage the assault. 

Pakistan’s Prime minister Imran Khan, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Foreign Office spokesman Dr. Muhammad Faisal and Director General of Pakistan Army’s media wing, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Maj-Gen. Asif Ghafoor strongly rejected false allegations of Indian media and government, which linked the Pulwama terror assault to Islamabad.

Taking cognizance of Indian blame game and war-like posture, offering cooperation and another chance at a dialogue over the Kashmir issue, Prime Minister Imran Khan said on February 19, this year that Pakistan will take action, if New Delhi shares any actionable evidence, concerning the suicide bombing in the Pulwama area. But, Indian extremist rulers rejected any cooperation with Islamabad and have continued threatening diplomacy against Pakistan.

In this regard, in a televised address on February 27, 2019, Prime Minister Imran Khan said that his country is ready to cooperate with New Delhi into the investigation of the February 14 suicide bombing, claimed by Pakistan-based armed group, JeM which was banned by the government. He called for talks with India and hoped better sense would prevail so that both sides could de-escalate.

Meanwhile, journalists who visited the targeted site of Balakot and a video released by Islamabad exposed India’s false statements that IAF fighters targeted the camp of JeM and killed 350 militants. Despite the demand of Indian opposition parties and some responsible media entities, Indian top civil and military officials have failed to provide any evidence or video regarding government’s claim in this connection.
Besides, by creating jingoism in India and war hysteria against Pakistan, Indian extremist Prime Minister Modi’s government has continued propaganda campaign against Pakistan. Indian security forces have also intensified shelling across the Line of Control (LoC) and compelled Pakistan Army to give a matching response.

It is notable that during the period of nature, law of jungle was order of the day, as the powerful could kill the weak mercilessly. In the modern era, India has been following the similar law of jungle in its refined form by employing barbaric tactics in the Indian Held Kashmir (IHK) in order to suppress the war of liberation which continues unabated by the Kahsmiris who are demanding their genuine right of self-determination as recognised by the UN resolutions.

In the aftermath of the Pulwama terror attack, many Kashmiri people, including students have been arrested and attacked and their shops looted by the Hindu extremists. Young people have been charged with sedition for criticizing the Indian Army, and Indians are lashing out at Pakistani civilians, including Bollywood actors.

Since last 71 years, the Kashmiri people have been endeavouring for an end to India’s illegal and bloody occupation. Atrocities being inflicted by the Indian forces on the Kashmiris have increased manifold particularly under the rule of Hindu fundamentalist party BJP. The amount of torture, killings and rapes perpetrated on Kashmiri people by Indian army personnel has already crossed all the thresholds of brutalities. Everyday, incidents of gashing of eyes, chopping off vital body-parts, use of ever-new methods of persecution during unending curfews speak volumes for India's state-sponsored violence on Kashmiris.

Even India-based human rights watchdogs and some veteran politicians in India are now fully convinced that grave acts of brutality are being committed by occupation forces in Kashmir. Recently, talking in a gathering organised under aegis of Foreign Correspondents Club (FCC) South Asia, ex-external affairs minister/BJP leader Yashwant Sinha candidly termed India’s wrong policies in handling Kashmir as “bundle of confusion”. He also admitted that “India has lost people of the valley emotionally” owing to Modi’s doctrine of brutality to suppress Kashmiri people.

Despite complete closure of the IOK for the foreign/local human right watchdogs and international media, the sporadic clippings and footages display the Indian army’s devilish acts of torture and carnage. As a rare show of moral support, United Nations Human Rights Council, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights and human rights set-up of the Organisation of the Islamic Cooperation also issued reports in 2018, pointing out grave violations of human rights by the occupation forces in the IHK.

On the other hand, Indian media in league with Indian deep state, has been vociferously blaming Pakistan and its primary intelligence agency ISI for all the unrest in the IOK , while, the ongoing ‘Intifada’ is an entirely local uprising as retaliation from the suppressed Kashmiris against Indian occupation spanned over 70 long years. Meanwhile, Removal of Hafiz Saeed’s name by US from its 2018-NDA list and his release orders by the Pakistani court have further frustrated the Indian media to spit fire against Pakistan and commit more atrocities on the Kashmiri Muslims.
It is mentionable that to pay homage to the martyrs in Kashmir and determination to the struggle of Kashmiri people, 5the February (2019) was observed with full support from the Kashmiris, living abroad and Pakistani media. The hallmark was presence of Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Quereshi in London to lead the efforts of international community at international level. Protests and seminars were organized by Kashmiris and Pakistanis in Europe, North America and important capitals of the world.

However, under new BJP-Modi strategy being executed in the IOK, a complete genocide of the Kashmiri people is being carried out to change the demographic structure of the IOK in utter defiance of international human rights laws. More bloodshed is feared in the days ahead due to use of brutal force and extra-judicial killings of innocent Kashmiris by Indian military and paramilitary troops.

Spill-over of purely indigenous freedom movement of Kashmiris to the other insurgency-infested states especially Khalistan, Mizoram and Assam is very much on the cards for India.

Nevertheless, various forms of state terrorism have been part of a deliberate campaign by the Indian army and paramilitary forces against Muslim Kashmiris, especially since 1989. It has been manifested in brutal tactics like crackdowns, curfews, illegal detentions, massacre, targeted killings, sieges, burning the houses, torture, disappearances, rape, breaking the legs, molestation of Muslim women and killing of persons through fake encounters.

Notably, in the recent past, social media proliferated the viral video of 22 year old young woman namely Ishrat Muneer Bhat (resident of Dangerpora, Pulwama district). Her bullet-riddled body was found in Sugan, Draggad village, Shopian district on January 31, 2019. She was doing Masters at the Indira Gandhi National Open University and was killed by the Indian Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAS). Besides similar tragic events, her killing is latest barbarity of the Indian LEAs which are now also not sparing the women folk in their bloody game of crushing the Kashmir movement.

Indian forces have employed various draconian laws like the Jammu and Kashmir Disturbed Areas Act, and the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act and Public Safety Act in killing the Kashmiri people, and for the arbitrarily arrest of any individual for an indefinite period.

Besides Human Rights Watch, in its various reports, Amnesty International has also pointed out grave human rights violations in the Indian controlled Kashmir, indicating, “The Muslim majority population in the Kashmir Valley suffers from the repressive tactics of the security forces”.

In its report on July 2, 2015, the Amnesty International has highlighted extrajudicial killings of the innocent persons at the hands of Indian security forces in the Indian Held Kashmir. The report said, “Tens of thousands of security forces are deployed in Indian-administered Kashmir…the Armed Forces Special Powers Act allows troops to shoot to kill suspected militants or arrest them without a warrant…not a single member of the armed forces has been tried in a civilian court for violating human rights in Kashmir…this lack of accountability has in turn facilitated other serious abuses…India has martyred one 100,000 people. More than 8,000 disappeared (while) in the custody of army and state police.”

In this context, European Union has passed a resolution about human rights abuses committed by Indian forces in the Indian Held Kashmir.

It is of particular attention that in 2008, a rights group reported unmarked graves in 55 villages across the northern regions of the Indian-held Kashmir. Then researchers and other groups reported finding thousands of mass graves without markers. In this respect, in August, 2011, Indian Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission officially acknowledged in its report that innocent civilians killed in the two-decade conflict have been buried in unmarked graves.

Foreign sources and human rights organisations have revealed that unnamed graves include those innocent persons, killed by the Indian military and paramilitary troops in the fake encounters including those who were tortured to death by the Indian secret agency RAW. In the recent past, more unmarked graves have been discovered.

Some online authentic sources suggest that recent wave of Kashmiri ‘Intifada’ has witnessed repression of Indian armed forces; large numbers of the dead and injured have been youngsters. The pellet guns used by security forces have damaged the faces of 1600 people and more than 1100 people have partially or wholly lost their eyesight making 2016 as the year of dead eyes.

In 2017, reports also disclosed that in the IOK, Indian security forces have also used chemical weapons against the Kashmiri civilians in violation of international law and Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In a development on July 4, 2017, the Indian Army had destroyed houses in Pulwama and killed 3 Kashmiri civilians. Upon recovery of the bodies, it was discovered that they were burnt beyond recognition. 

Sources report that Indian Army is emulating Israeli tactics by using white phosphorus bombs to destroy houses of Kashmiris suspected of harboring Mujahideen. The same tactics was used by Israel during its attacks on Gaza and it seems that these weapons have been provided by Israel to India for use in the IOK.

In fact, Indian authorities are not willing to talk with Kashmiri people on political grounds. New Delhi reached to a conclusion that only bullet is the right way of dealing with Kashmiris, demanding their right of self-determination. Surprisingly, Indian successive governments and particularly the Modi regime are trying to ignore the dynamics of the freedom movement of Kashmiris for the sake of their alien rule.

Failed in suppressing the Kashmir movement, Indian central government imposed President’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir which started from December 20, 2018. The main purpose was to accelerate atrocities on the Kashmiris who are demanding their genuine right of self-determination.

Taking note of the recent war-like situation between Pakistan and India, especially, Russia and some Arab countries, including Turkey and the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern over tensions between the two neighbouring countries, and have offered their mediatory roles between both the nuclear countries for de-escalation.

Unfortunately, New Delhi which has refused the mediatory role of any country, is still showing its intransigence to resolve the Kashmir issue with Islamabad by neglecting the fact that Kashmir remains a nuclear flashpoint between both the neighbouring countries.

It is worth-mentioning that the organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on February 26, 2019, condemned India’s incursion against Pakistan, urging the two countries to exercise restraint and avoid any steps that could endanger peace and security in the region. On the same day, in an emergency meeting, the OIC Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir expressed grave concern at the rising tensions in South Asia and strongly condemned the recent wave of repression, killing of innocent civilians, and frequent incidents of rape perpetrated by Indian forces in occupied Kashmir.

In this connection, concluding the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) of the OIC, held in Abu Dhabi on March 1-2, 2019, a resolution was passed, which condemned the Indian state terrorism in occupied Kashmir and reaffirmed its unwavering support for the Kashmiri people. It reiterated that Jammu and Kashmir remained the core dispute between Pakistan and India. The resolution also reminded the international community of its obligation to ensure implementation of UN Security Council resolutions on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute. The OIC member states adopted another resolution which expressed grave concern over the Indian violation of Pakistani airspace; affirmed Pakistan’s right to self-defence; and urged India to refrain from the threat or use of force. The resolution on regional peace and security in South Asia also welcomed Prime Minister Imran Khan’s renewed offer of dialogue to India and the goodwill gesture of handing over the Indian pilot. However, it also proved Pakistan’s diplomatic victory over India.

It is noteworthy that Indian Prime Minister Modi’s extremist party-BJP had got a land sliding triumph in the Indian elections 2014 on the basis of anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan slogans. Therefore, double game has become the BJP strategy to win the Indian general elections 2019.

Undoubtedly, we can conclude that by exploiting the false flag terror attack at Pulwama, Indian Prime Minister Modi has intensified war-hysteria against Pakistan. New Delhi’s main aim is to deflect the attention of the international community from the new phase of Kashmiri ‘Intifada’, while in this regard; pressure has been mounting on the Modi government both domestically and internationally to resolve the dispute of Kashmir with Pakistan. As the struggle of Kashmiri people has entered into crucial phase with increasing frustration of New Delhi, India accelerated atrocities and oppressive tactics in the Indian Occupied Kashmir.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com 


Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Pak-India Tension: Diplomatic Victory of Pakistan by Sajjad Shaukat (JR 143 SS 30)










Pak-India Tension: Diplomatic Victory of Pakistan by Sajjad Shaukat (JR 143 SS 30)

This week, tension escalated rapidly between India and Pakistan when on February 27, this year, in response to the Indian so-called pre-emptive air strike near the town of Balakot, close to the border with Pakistan’s sector of Kashmir, Pakistan Air Force (PAF) shot down two Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jets and launched aerial strikes at six targets in the Indian Occupied Kashmir (IoK).

Addressing a press conference on the same day, Director General of Pakistan Army’s media wing, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Maj-Gen. Asif Ghafoor said that Pakistan Air Force have conducted aerial strikes across the Line of Control (LoC) from Pakistani airspace and shot down two Indian aircraft. One of the two Indian air force pilots was taken into custody.

Regarding Indian surgical strike, Maj-Gen. Asif Ghafoor elaborated: “There are only mud-brick homes. There is no madrassas. There isn’t even a concrete house…Two of the dried mud structures were damaged in the explosions…No one has been killed, no one has been seriously hurt…Indian planes crossed into the Muzafarabad sector of Pakistani-side of Kashmir…Pakistan scrambled its warplanes and the Indian jets released their payload in haste near Balakot.”

Afterwards, journalists visited the targeted site of Balakot and Islamabad also released a video which exposed the false statements of New Delhi that IAF fighters targeted the camp of Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and killed 350 militants.

But, during the press briefing on February 26, India Foreign Secretary Vijay Keshav Gokhale called the strikes on Pakistani soil “non-military preemptive action”. He refused to answer questions by the media, as he could not show any proof in this respect.

Following the false flag Pulwama terror attack in the Indian Held Kashmir (IHK), which killed 44 Indian soldiers—Islamist militant group JeM claimed responsibility soon for the car suicide attack, New Delhi provoked Islamabad through the so-called surgical strike.

Without any investigation and evidence Indian high officials and media started accusing Islamabad, saying that the attackers had come from Pakistan to stage the assault.

The Indian foreign ministry allegedly said in a statement, “We demand that Pakistan stop supporting terrorists and terror groups operating from their territory and dismantle the infrastructure operated by terrorist outfits to launch attacks in other countries.”

On the other side, Pakistan’s Foreign Office spokesperson stated: “We have always condemned acts of violence anywhere in the world…We strongly reject any insinuation by elements in the Indian media and government that seek to link the attack to Pakistan without investigations.” Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Quereshi also rejected Indian false allegations regarding Pulwama attack.
Speaking to the Indian media, former Chief Minister of the Indian Held Kashmir Farooq Abdullah said: “I was saddened to hear about the deaths of the soldiers…This is not something happening for the first time. These incidents happen everyday there…India should talk with Kashmiris, because using the force of guns and army is not the solution…Don’t blame Pakistan because local people are joining Kashmiri fight” [War of liberation].

Meanwhile, on February 21, 2019, India was humiliated at the diplomatic level when Pakistan’s name was not mentioned in the declaration by the UN Security Council condemning Pulwama attack. New Delhi tried everything possible to involve Pakistan’s name in the statement and tried to use American influence as well. Multiple countries were briefed in New Delhi regarding the attack.

However, various contradictory developments and reports proved that Pulwama terror attack was a false flag operation, conducted by New Delhi to malign Islamabad in order to obtain various designs.

In this regard, quoting the report of the daily Kashmir Times of September 10, 2017, Pakistan’s media and even some leading newspapers of India revealed that the Indian drama was exposed after the disclosure that the alleged suicide attacker of the Pulwama attack Adil Ahmed Dar was already in the custody of the Indian army.The Indian army had arrested Adil Ahmed Dar during an operation in Shopian on September 10, 2017…It is a big question that how he carried out the suicide attack when he was already in the custody of Indian army.”

Blindly alleging Pakistan, some Indian newspapers, especially India Today wrote: “Intelligence agencies in Jammu and Kashmir believe Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed commander-Ghazi Abdul Rasheed-is the mastermind behind the gruesome Pulwama terror attack that rocked the nation on February 14. He is one of the closest aides of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) chief Maulana Masood Azha.”

It is notable that religious cleric Abdul Rasheed Ghazi was killed in 2007 during the Lal Masjid operation in Islamabad, launched by the then President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.

Nevertheless, taking cognizance of Indian blame game and war-like posture, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan said on February 19, this year, that Pakistan will take action, if New Delhi shares any actionable evidence, concerning the suicide bombing in the occupied Kashmir’s Pulwama area, which targeted Indian paramilitary soldiers. Offering cooperation and another chance at a dialogue over the Kashmir issue, the premier had also warned India against any act of aggression, saying Pakistan would not hesitate in retaliating to a provocation.

But, by creating jingoism in India, Indian extremist government of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rejected any cooperation with Islamabad and has continued threatening diplomacy against Pakistan.

In a televised address on February 27, Prime Minister Imran Khan had said that his country is ready to cooperate with New Delhi into the investigation of the February 14 suicide bombing, claimed by Pakistan-based armed group, JeM which was banned by the government. He called for talks with India and hoped better sense would prevail so that both sides could de-escalate. Khan pointed out: “History tells us that wars are full of miscalculation. My question is that given the weapons [Nuclear] we have can we afford miscalculation.”

India has also handed over its files on the February 14 bombing to Islamabad. Prime Minister Khan on February 28 stated in the joint session of the parliament, “Today they [India] have sent a dossier on Pulwama…They should have given us the dossier first, and if we had not taken action, then they could have taken action.”

In his address, Khan reiterated his call for de-escalation. He explained, “I am saying to India: do not take it further than this. Because whatever you do, Pakistan will be forced to retaliate. And then two countries who have the weapons that the two of us, we should never even think of such a thing.”

Prime Minister Khan also announced the release of Indian captured pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman who was attacked by a mob and then saved by Pakistan’s army. He was released on March 1 and handed over to the Indian authorities.

In this context, Khan remarked: “We have an Indian pilot. As a peace gesture we will release him”.

Khan also stated, “I tried to call Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi…I wanted to make it clear that we do not want any kind of escalation”. But, Modi did not attend his telephone call. 

It is of particular attention that in a rare joint press conference by the top brass of the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force on February 28, the top military officers also presented evidence that Pakistan had AMRAAM missiles mounted on its American-made F-16 fighter jets to target Indian military installations.

Concealing ground realities, the press briefing by the Indian military’s high officials appeared to be an apology of the highest order, clueless and confused. They had no answers to the questions of the journalists and even no proof of claimed damage in Balakot strike was presented. They could not provide any evidence of JeM camp and killing of 350 terrorists. The air force officer said that he cannot comment on it and left it to the civil government. Similarly, no evidence of Pakistani F-16 which they claimed was shot down could be presented in the briefing. While, they confirmed aerial strikes of Pakistan on the Indian Controlled Kashmir by displaying fragments from a missile they claimed matched the Pakistani F-16 fighter jet that purportedly crossed into Indian airspace and was shot down.

Pakistan was quick to claim that it did not use F-16s in the attack and that it had lost no aircraft. However, one of the pictures released by Pakistan showed wreckage of the MiG-21 fighter.

It is worth-mentioning that ISPR said in a statement on February 28, “Pakistan’s armed forces are on high alert along the Line of Control [LoC] and are prepared to deal with any Indian aggression…During the last 48 hours, Indian troops have resorted to increased ceasefire violations in Kotli, Khuiratta and Tatta Pani sectors along LoC…India’s deliberate firing on civilians resulted in the martyrdom of four citizens…Pakistan Army troops responded effectively to the violations and there were reports of casualties to Indian forces and damage to Indian posts”.

Some of Pakistan’s airports have been closed to commercial flights. The operation of a bi-weekly cross-border train service between India’s capital New Delhi and Pakistan’s eastern city of Lahore has been temporarily suspended due to the prevailing tensions between the two countries.

Nonetheless, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan’s move to release the Indian captured pilot was described as a diplomatic victory of Pakistan over India. Many Indian politicians, journalists and renowned persons, including Kashmiri leaders and artists appreciated Khan’s optimistic decision as a peace gesture.

On the other side, India’s 21 opposition parties and famous figures, chief ministers of Delhi, Bengal, puppet chief minister of IoK, civil society groups and artists criticised Modi for continuing his scheduled public events, including an election rally, while staying mum amid a major military stand-off with Pakistan. Nevertheless, it shows Indian diplomatic defeat.

It is mentionable that many Western countries such as US, UK, France, Germany and Russia, including China, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have expressed concern at the current situation, urging New Delhi and Islamabad to show restraint and de-escalation.

Particularly, Mike Pompeo, US secretary of state stated that he has spoken with the leaders of India and Pakistan and has urged them to avoid “any action that would escalate and greatly increase risk”.

On February 28, this year, US President Donald Trump has hoped that Pak-India tension will de-escalate soon—the United States has been mediating between the two sides and trying to have them stop.

Earlier, President Trump said on February 22, 2019, “Right now between Pakistan and India, there is a very dangerous situation. We would like to see it [hostilities] stop. We are very much involved in that [process].” Unlike his previous blame game of cross-border terrorism against Pakistan in relation to Afghanistan, Trump also admitted that Washington has improved her relations with Islamabad shortly.

Especially, Russia and some Arab countries, including Turkey and the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern over tensions between Pakistan and India, and have offered their mediatory roles between both the nuclear countries for de-escalation.

Besides, the organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on February 26, condemned India’s incursion against Pakistan, urging the two countries to exercise restraint and avoid any steps that could endanger peace and security in the region. On the same day, in an emergency meeting, the OIC Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir expressed grave concern at the rising tensions in South Asia and strongly condemned the recent wave of repression, killing of innocent civilians, and frequent incidents of rape perpetrated by Indian forces in occupied Kashmir.

Notably, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi told the joint session of parliament on March 1 that he would not attend the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) of the OIC in Abu Dhabi (Held in Abu Dhabi on March 1-2, 2019) over the presence of India’s minister of external affairs Sushma Swaraj, adding that lower ranking officials would attend to represent Pakistan’s interests. In fact, India was invited to participate in the conference on February 23, 2019 before the surgical strike and response of Islamabad in this connection. Indian media exaggerated the participation of Swaraj as a diplomatic triumph of New Delhi over Islamabad. But, India was frustrated, when concluding the CFM conference, a resolution was passed, which condemned the Indian state terrorism in occupied Kashmir and reaffirmed its unwavering support for the Kashmiri people. It reiterated that Jammu and Kashmir remained the core dispute between Pakistan and India. The resolution also reminded the international community of its obligation to ensure implementation of UN Security Council resolutions on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute. The OIC member states adopted another resolution which expressed grave concern over the Indian violation of Pakistani airspace; affirmed Pakistan’s right to self-defence; and urged India to refrain from the threat or use of force. The resolution on regional peace and security in South Asia also welcomed Prime Minister Imran Khan’s renewed offer of dialogue to India and the goodwill gesture of handing over the Indian pilot. However, it also proved Pakistan’s diplomatic victory over India.

It is also of particular attention that Indian Prime Minister Modi’s extremist party- BJP had got a land sliding triumph in the Indian elections 2014 on the basis of anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan slogans. Therefore, since the Prime Minister Modi came to power, he has been implementing anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan agenda with the support of fanatic coalition outfits.

Now, double game has become the BJP strategy to win the Indian general elections 2019. In this respect, BJP leadership seems to have geared up its activity for forthcoming poll-2019.

In the aftermath of the false flag Pulwama terror assault, New Delhi also launched a diplomatic offensive to isolate Pakistan in the international community. But, India herself was isolated, as world’s major countries held India responsible for heightening the tension with Pakistan through surgical strike. Besides, Kashmir issue has been internationalized to a greater extent, as Indian security forces have accelerated state terrorism on the innocent Kashmiris who are waging war of liberation and are demanding their right of self-determination, recognized by the related UNO resolutions.

In fact, without bothering for nuclear war, in the aftermath of the terror attack in Pulwama, India is deliberately increasing war hysteria against Pakistan.

It is noteworthy after the World War 11; nuclear weapons were never used, and were only employed as a strategic threat. During the heightened days of the Cold War, many crises arose in Suez Canal, Korea, Cuba and Vietnam when the US and the former Soviet Union were willing to use atomic weapons, but they stopped because of the fear of nuclear war which could eliminate both the super powers. Hence, the two rivals preferred to resolve their differences through diplomacy.

In the past too, Indian rulers had intended to implement their doctrine of limited war in Kashmir or to fight a conventional war with Pakistan, but they could not do so owing to Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.

Unlike the former Soviet Union and the USA, war-like situation exists between New Delhi and Islamabad due to the perennial firing by the Indian forces across the Line of Control and the Working Boundary in wake of the unresolved issue of Kashmir which remains a nuclear flashpoint. And both the neighbouring countries have waged three wars on this dispute.

In the present circumstances, BJP-led fanatic government of Modi is badly mistaken, if it overestimates India’s power and underestimates Pakistan’s power. In this case, a prolonged conflict with conventional weapons could result into atomic war between the two countries.

Taking note of the Indian war-like posture, Prime Minister Imran Khan on February 27, chaired a meeting of the National Command Authority (NCA) to discuss a response to India’s Line of Control violation. The meeting was attended by Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee and the Chiefs of all three services. The NCA is the apex civilian-led command headed by the prime minister to oversee the policy formulation, exercises, deployment, research and development, employment and operational command and control of the country’s nuclear arsenals.

Unlike India, Pakistan’s ruling party, opposition parties, members of civil societies and military are on one page regarding Indian aggression.

In this connection, on March 1, the joint sitting of the Pakistan’s parliament in demonstration of unity against any external aggression, passed a unanimous resolution strongly condemning the blatant Indian aggression of 26th and 27th of February against the country and the parliamentary leaders said that they are standing shoulder to shoulder to the armed forces of Pakistan. The resolution completely rejected India’s self-serving and fictitious claims of having destroyed alleged terrorist facility—pointed out that facts on the grounds clearly contradict India’s false claim and so have been testified by independent observers. The resolution noted that timely and effective action of the Pakistan Air Force repulsed the Indian attack without loss of life and property—India’s baseless allegations against Pakistan in the wake of Pulwama attack were politically—the Indian government’s subsequent action has been guided by its electoral calculations. Strongly condemning the Indian atrocities in the IHK, the resolution rejected the India’s attempt to project the legitimate Kashmiri struggle for self-determination as terrorism. It reiterated that Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute, pending on the agenda of the UN Security Council due to Indian intransigence. It underscored that a just and peaceful solution of Kashmir dispute. The resolution mentioned Prime Minister Imran Khan’s call to avoid further escalation and urged the parliament of India to support the call by this joint session of Pakistani parliament for de-escalation and dialogue between Pakistan and India.
Undoubtedly, we can conclude that peaceful strategy of Prime Minister Imran Khan and belligerent policy of Prime Minister Narendra Modi have culminated into diplomatic victory of Pakistan over India.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com